Digital Asset
Intelligence

Hacked Event Broadcast

Live source archive

Verified blockchain security incidents with original evidence and historical event dates.

Filters

Historical events use their original event dates. Latest event dates first. Severity follows existing archive classifications.

May 22, 2026

2 verified updates
Fractal Protocol’s USDF vault on Arbitrum was exploited via a smart contract logic flaw. The attacker used an Aave V3 USDC.e flash loan, looped through Balancer V2 batchSwap callbacks, and recursively called the vault’s deposit (0xb6b55f25) and withdraw functions. This exploited the fixed daily-accrued tokenPrice (~1.27 USDC/USDF) and share-rounding accounting issues without proper invariant checks across re-entrant flows, allowing the extraction of approximately 13,700 USDC.e. The vault’s liquid USDC buffer dropped from around 14,778 USDC to near zero. Pre-hack TVL was approximately 97,270 USD.ExpandCollapse

Fractal Protocol’s USDF vault on Arbitrum was exploited via a smart contract logic flaw. The attacker used an Aave V3 USDC.e flash loan, looped through Balancer V2 batchSwap callbacks, and recursively called the vault’s deposit (0xb6b55f25) and withdraw functions. This exploited the fixed daily-accrued tokenPrice (~1.27 USDC/USDF) and share-rounding accounting issues without proper invariant checks across re-entrant flows, allowing the extraction of approximately 13,700 USDC.e. The vault’s liquid USDC buffer dropped from around 14,778 USDC to near zero. Pre-hack TVL was approximately 97,270 USD.

Amount of loss
$ 13,700
Attack method
Smart Contract Vulnerability
Arbitrum EcosystemSecurity
Polymarket suffered an internal private key compromise incident. A six-year-old operational wallet private key (used for the rewards payout system and market initializer) was compromised, resulting in the extraction of approximately $573,200 (in USDC and POL) from addresses on the Polygon chain. Polymarket officials quickly clarified that this was not due to any smart contract or UMA CTF Adapter vulnerability; user funds, market resolutions, and the platform’s core functions remain fully secure. The team immediately rotated the private key, revoked permissions, and collaborated to freeze approximately $164,000 in funds, resulting in a net loss of about $409,200. The incident was first publicly flagged by on-chain investigator ZachXBT, and the platform continues to operate normally.ExpandCollapse

Polymarket suffered an internal private key compromise incident. A six-year-old operational wallet private key (used for the rewards payout system and market initializer) was compromised, resulting in the extraction of approximately $573,200 (in USDC and POL) from addresses on the Polygon chain. Polymarket officials quickly clarified that this was not due to any smart contract or UMA CTF Adapter vulnerability; user funds, market resolutions, and the platform’s core functions remain fully secure. The team immediately rotated the private key, revoked permissions, and collaborated to freeze approximately $164,000 in funds, resulting in a net loss of about $409,200. The incident was first publicly flagged by on-chain investigator ZachXBT, and the platform continues to operate normally.

Amount of loss
$ 573,200
Attack method
Private Key Leakage
Polygon EcosystemSecurity

May 20, 2026

2 verified updates
The Butter Bridge V3.1 (part of MAP Protocol and Butter Network) was exploited. An attacker used a vulnerability in the OmniServiceProxy contract’s retry message verification logic, specifically an abi.encodePacked hash collision with dynamic-bytes fields. This allowed forging a cross-chain retry message that bypassed authentication, resulting in the minting of approximately 1 quadrillion (10^15) MAPO tokens (about 4.8 million times the legitimate ~208 million circulating supply). The attacker dumped ~1 billion fake MAPO into the Uniswap V4 ETH/MAPO pool, extracting roughly $180,000 in liquidity (≈52.21 ETH). The teams immediately paused the bridge and related swaps. User funds in pending swaps are safe, and a patch/audit/redeployment is in progress. The remaining ~999 trillion fake tokens stay in the attacker’s wallet, posing ongoing dilution risk.ExpandCollapse

The Butter Bridge V3.1 (part of MAP Protocol and Butter Network) was exploited. An attacker used a vulnerability in the OmniServiceProxy contract’s retry message verification logic, specifically an abi.encodePacked hash collision with dynamic-bytes fields. This allowed forging a cross-chain retry message that bypassed authentication, resulting in the minting of approximately 1 quadrillion (10^15) MAPO tokens (about 4.8 million times the legitimate ~208 million circulating supply). The attacker dumped ~1 billion fake MAPO into the Uniswap V4 ETH/MAPO pool, extracting roughly $180,000 in liquidity (≈52.21 ETH). The teams immediately paused the bridge and related swaps. User funds in pending swaps are safe, and a patch/audit/redeployment is in progress. The remaining ~999 trillion fake tokens stay in the attacker’s wallet, posing ongoing dilution risk.

Amount of loss
$ 180,000
Attack method
Smart Contract Vulnerability
ETH EcosystemSecurity
RetoSwap (a Tor-based P2P multisig DEX powered by the Haveno trade protocol for trading Monero) was actively exploited. Attackers sent fake, out-of-order ACK messages impersonating the arbitrator during ongoing trades. This tricked the client into updating the arbitrator’s node address to the attacker’s controlled address, allowing them to create a compromised multisig wallet before the victim deposited funds. The exploit mainly affected crypto-to-crypto trades. RetoSwap immediately banned the attacker’s onion address, forced a client version update to halt all trading, and is working on a patch and potential recovery for affected users. Approximately 7,000 XMR were stolen.ExpandCollapse

RetoSwap (a Tor-based P2P multisig DEX powered by the Haveno trade protocol for trading Monero) was actively exploited. Attackers sent fake, out-of-order ACK messages impersonating the arbitrator during ongoing trades. This tricked the client into updating the arbitrator’s node address to the attacker’s controlled address, allowing them to create a compromised multisig wallet before the victim deposited funds. The exploit mainly affected crypto-to-crypto trades. RetoSwap immediately banned the attacker’s onion address, forced a client version update to halt all trading, and is working on a patch and potential recovery for affected users. Approximately 7,000 XMR were stolen.

Amount of loss
$ 2,700,000
Attack method
Protocol Logic Vulnerability
WalletSecurity

May 19, 2026

2 verified updates
The AI-powered crypto trading agent platform Bankr on the Base network suffered a social engineering attack. The attacker exploited prompt injection techniques targeting the automated agent trust layer between Grok and Bankrbot — including malicious inputs such as Morse code — to trick the system into executing unauthorized transaction signatures, ultimately gaining access to 14 user wallets and transferring funds. Bankr has suspended the affected functionality, launched an investigation, and pledged to fully reimburse all losses from its treasury.ExpandCollapse

The AI-powered crypto trading agent platform Bankr on the Base network suffered a social engineering attack. The attacker exploited prompt injection techniques targeting the automated agent trust layer between Grok and Bankrbot — including malicious inputs such as Morse code — to trick the system into executing unauthorized transaction signatures, ultimately gaining access to 14 user wallets and transferring funds. Bankr has suspended the affected functionality, launched an investigation, and pledged to fully reimburse all losses from its treasury.

Amount of loss
$ 440,000
Attack method
Social Engineering
Base EcosystemSecurity
HermesVault, an Algorand-based privacy protocol using zero-knowledge proofs for private transactions, was exploited. The attacker exploited a flaw in the key reset defense logic within the withdrawal verification script. This allowed bypassing the zero-knowledge (zk) verification process and unauthorized withdrawal of funds. The protocol permanently shut down operations following the incident. Lead engineer Giulio Pizzini confirmed that the core zk circuit remained secure, but the auxiliary withdrawal script had a vulnerability. The team patched the issue, refunded a large portion of the funds, and initiated a full refund process for affected users.ExpandCollapse

HermesVault, an Algorand-based privacy protocol using zero-knowledge proofs for private transactions, was exploited. The attacker exploited a flaw in the key reset defense logic within the withdrawal verification script. This allowed bypassing the zero-knowledge (zk) verification process and unauthorized withdrawal of funds. The protocol permanently shut down operations following the incident. Lead engineer Giulio Pizzini confirmed that the core zk circuit remained secure, but the auxiliary withdrawal script had a vulnerability. The team patched the issue, refunded a large portion of the funds, and initiated a full refund process for affected users.

Amount of loss
$ 29,466
Attack method
Smart Contract Vulnerability
OtherSecurity

May 18, 2026

2 verified updates
Echo Protocol’s eBTC on Monad was compromised due to an admin private key leak. The attacker granted themselves minting rights, minted 1,000 unbacked eBTC (~$76.7M nominal value), deposited 45 eBTC (~$3.45M) as collateral into Curvance to borrow ~11.29 WBTC (~$867K), bridged it to Ethereum, swapped for ETH, and sent ~384 ETH (~$821K) to Tornado Cash. The remaining 955 eBTC stays under attacker control, posing ongoing depegging risk.ExpandCollapse

Echo Protocol’s eBTC on Monad was compromised due to an admin private key leak. The attacker granted themselves minting rights, minted 1,000 unbacked eBTC (~$76.7M nominal value), deposited 45 eBTC (~$3.45M) as collateral into Curvance to borrow ~11.29 WBTC (~$867K), bridged it to Ethereum, swapped for ETH, and sent ~384 ETH (~$821K) to Tornado Cash. The remaining 955 eBTC stays under attacker control, posing ongoing depegging risk.

Amount of loss
$ 821,700
Attack method
Private Key Leakage
ETH EcosystemSecurity
Blockaid detected an ongoing exploit on the Verus-Ethereum Bridge. The attacker drained approximately $11.58 million in assets (including ~1,625 ETH, ~103.6 tBTC, and ~147k USDC). The funds were swapped and consolidated into a drainer wallet (e.g., 0x65Cb8b128Bf6e690761044CCECA422bb239C25F9). This is a cross-chain bridge incident affecting the bridge infrastructure, not the core Verus blockchain. The project had recently issued an urgent update, but the exploit still occurred. Funds remain in the attacker's control as of the latest reports. On May 22, PeckShield's monitoring revealed that the exploiter of the Verus cross-chain bridge has returned 4,052.4 ETH (valued at around $8.5 million) to the team's designated address. This recovery accounts for 75% of the total plundered funds, while the remaining 25% (approximately 1,350 ETH) is being retained in the hacker's wallet as a bug bounty.ExpandCollapse

Blockaid detected an ongoing exploit on the Verus-Ethereum Bridge. The attacker drained approximately $11.58 million in assets (including ~1,625 ETH, ~103.6 tBTC, and ~147k USDC). The funds were swapped and consolidated into a drainer wallet (e.g., 0x65Cb8b128Bf6e690761044CCECA422bb239C25F9). This is a cross-chain bridge incident affecting the bridge infrastructure, not the core Verus blockchain. The project had recently issued an urgent update, but the exploit still occurred. Funds remain in the attacker's control as of the latest reports. On May 22, PeckShield's monitoring revealed that the exploiter of the Verus cross-chain bridge has returned 4,052.4 ETH (valued at around $8.5 million) to the team's designated address. This recovery accounts for 75% of the total plundered funds, while the remaining 25% (approximately 1,350 ETH) is being retained in the hacker's wallet as a bug bounty.

Amount of loss
$ 11,580,000
Attack method
Smart Contract Vulnerability
ETH EcosystemSecurity

May 17, 2026

1 verified update
SEA Token on Arbitrum was exploited through a flashloan-enabled price manipulation attack due to a protocol logic flaw in its Solidity smart contract. The attacker used a flash loan to artificially manipulate the token price (likely via liquidity pool imbalance or oracle dependency), allowing unauthorized extraction of approximately $153,000 in value.ExpandCollapse

SEA Token on Arbitrum was exploited through a flashloan-enabled price manipulation attack due to a protocol logic flaw in its Solidity smart contract. The attacker used a flash loan to artificially manipulate the token price (likely via liquidity pool imbalance or oracle dependency), allowing unauthorized extraction of approximately $153,000 in value.

Amount of loss
$ 153,000
Attack method
Flash Loan Price Manipulation
Arbitrum EcosystemSecurity

May 15, 2026

2 verified updates
Adshares Bridge was exploited on Ethereum around May 15, 2026. The attacker used the bridge-minter EOA to sign three wrapTo() calls with non-existent native-chain transaction IDs on the Adshares canonical chain. This allowed minting large amounts of fake wrapped ADS (wADS: 99,999.93 ×2 + 999,999.94). The fake tokens were then dumped via Uniswap V4 UniversalRouter, draining roughly $628K in ETH and USDC from liquidity pools. Security researchers flagged it quickly, and the project posted an on-chain whitehat message offering a 10% bounty for return of 90% of funds.ExpandCollapse

Adshares Bridge was exploited on Ethereum around May 15, 2026. The attacker used the bridge-minter EOA to sign three wrapTo() calls with non-existent native-chain transaction IDs on the Adshares canonical chain. This allowed minting large amounts of fake wrapped ADS (wADS: 99,999.93 ×2 + 999,999.94). The fake tokens were then dumped via Uniswap V4 UniversalRouter, draining roughly $628K in ETH and USDC from liquidity pools. Security researchers flagged it quickly, and the project posted an on-chain whitehat message offering a 10% bounty for return of 90% of funds.

Amount of loss
$ 628,000
Attack method
Bridge Verification Bypass
ETH EcosystemSecurity
One of THORChain’s Asgard vaults was compromised, with the attacker draining funds simultaneously across multiple supported chains (at least nine), resulting in losses of approximately $10-11 million+ (including ~36.75 BTC worth ~$3M and ~$7M+ in EVM tokens). The protocol halted trading and signing after automatic detection of abnormal behavior. User funds and LP positions were safe; only protocol-owned funds were affected. The attack is linked to vault churn address poisoning or a vulnerability in the GG20 TSS (threshold signature scheme) implementation, allowing key material leakage and private key reconstruction over time. THORChain confirmed the incident, is investigating with security partners, and launched a recovery portal for claims (no user compensation program for protocol losses).ExpandCollapse

One of THORChain’s Asgard vaults was compromised, with the attacker draining funds simultaneously across multiple supported chains (at least nine), resulting in losses of approximately $10-11 million+ (including ~36.75 BTC worth ~$3M and ~$7M+ in EVM tokens). The protocol halted trading and signing after automatic detection of abnormal behavior. User funds and LP positions were safe; only protocol-owned funds were affected. The attack is linked to vault churn address poisoning or a vulnerability in the GG20 TSS (threshold signature scheme) implementation, allowing key material leakage and private key reconstruction over time. THORChain confirmed the incident, is investigating with security partners, and launched a recovery portal for claims (no user compensation program for protocol losses).

Amount of loss
$ 10,700,000
Attack method
GG20 TSS Vulnerability
OtherSecurity

May 13, 2026

2 verified updates
ShapeShift’s FOX Colony (a community governance and participation program for FOX token holders) on Arbitrum was exploited via a smart contract vulnerability in its Colony Network contracts. The attacker drained approximately $132.7K in USDC and FOX tokens in a single sophisticated transaction by exploiting a meta-transaction self-call flaw combined with DSAuth authorization logic. The core exchange platform was unaffected; this impacted the DAO/community treasury.ExpandCollapse

ShapeShift’s FOX Colony (a community governance and participation program for FOX token holders) on Arbitrum was exploited via a smart contract vulnerability in its Colony Network contracts. The attacker drained approximately $132.7K in USDC and FOX tokens in a single sophisticated transaction by exploiting a meta-transaction self-call flaw combined with DSAuth authorization logic. The core exchange platform was unaffected; this impacted the DAO/community treasury.

Amount of loss
$ 132,700
Attack method
Smart Contract Vulnerability
Arbitrum EcosystemSecurity
Decentralized cross-chain aggregation protocol Transit Finance suffered an exploit on its deprecated (2022-era) TRON smart contract, resulting in approximately $1.88 million in DAI being drained. The stolen funds were transferred to an Ethereum address. The team confirmed it was isolated to legacy code, stated that current contracts are secure, completed remediation on May 12, and promised full user compensation. They sent an on-chain message to the attacker offering a bug bounty for return within 48 hours, or they would pursue legal action.ExpandCollapse

Decentralized cross-chain aggregation protocol Transit Finance suffered an exploit on its deprecated (2022-era) TRON smart contract, resulting in approximately $1.88 million in DAI being drained. The stolen funds were transferred to an Ethereum address. The team confirmed it was isolated to legacy code, stated that current contracts are secure, completed remediation on May 12, and promised full user compensation. They sent an on-chain message to the attacker offering a bug bounty for return within 48 hours, or they would pursue legal action.

Amount of loss
$ 1,880,000
Attack method
Smart Contract Vulnerability
ETH EcosystemSecurity

May 12, 2026

2 verified updates
Aurellion Labs' Diamond Proxy contract (EIP-2535) was exploited due to an unprotected initialize(address) function in the SafeOwnable Facet. Although an owner was set, the OpenZeppelin-style _initialized storage slot remained 0, allowing re-initialization. The attacker called initialize() to take ownership, used diamondCut to add a malicious facet with pullERC20/sweep functions, and drained USDC from wallets that had previously approved the diamond proxy. The project paused operations, committed to reimbursing users, and advised revoking old approvals.ExpandCollapse

Aurellion Labs' Diamond Proxy contract (EIP-2535) was exploited due to an unprotected initialize(address) function in the SafeOwnable Facet. Although an owner was set, the OpenZeppelin-style _initialized storage slot remained 0, allowing re-initialization. The attacker called initialize() to take ownership, used diamondCut to add a malicious facet with pullERC20/sweep functions, and drained USDC from wallets that had previously approved the diamond proxy. The project paused operations, committed to reimbursing users, and advised revoking old approvals.

Amount of loss
$ 456,000
Attack method
Smart Contract Vulnerability
ETH EcosystemSecurity
On May 12, 2026, at approximately 10:11 UTC, the SQ Protocol on BNB Chain was exploited for $346,137. The attacker abused a hardcoded owner backdoor in the verified Staking contract (0x404404a845fff0201f3a4d419b4839fc419c99f7). Using a type-0x4 transaction with authorizationList, they took ownership, minted fake staking claims, redeemed ~296.5K USDT, swept SQi tokens, and dumped them in the SQi/USDT pool for additional profit. Total realized loss: approximately $346.1K.ExpandCollapse

On May 12, 2026, at approximately 10:11 UTC, the SQ Protocol on BNB Chain was exploited for $346,137. The attacker abused a hardcoded owner backdoor in the verified Staking contract (0x404404a845fff0201f3a4d419b4839fc419c99f7). Using a type-0x4 transaction with authorizationList, they took ownership, minted fake staking claims, redeemed ~296.5K USDT, swept SQi tokens, and dumped them in the SQi/USDT pool for additional profit. Total realized loss: approximately $346.1K.

Amount of loss
$ 346,100
Attack method
Smart Contract Vulnerability
BSC EcosystemSecurity

May 11, 2026

4 verified updates
A logic flaw in Huma Finance’s deprecated V1 BaseCreditPool contracts on Polygon was exploited, draining approximately 101,400 USDC and USDC.e from accumulated protocol fees and pool owner fees. No user funds were at risk, PST token unaffected. The team had already been sunsetting V1 pools and immediately paused all V1 contracts. Huma’s V2 on Solana is a complete rewrite and remains secure.ExpandCollapse

A logic flaw in Huma Finance’s deprecated V1 BaseCreditPool contracts on Polygon was exploited, draining approximately 101,400 USDC and USDC.e from accumulated protocol fees and pool owner fees. No user funds were at risk, PST token unaffected. The team had already been sunsetting V1 pools and immediately paused all V1 contracts. Huma’s V2 on Solana is a complete rewrite and remains secure.

Amount of loss
$ 101,400
Attack method
Smart Contract Vulnerability
Polygon EcosystemSecurity
Ink Finance’s Workspace Treasury Proxy contract on Polygon was exploited due to a whitelist validation logic flaw. The attacker deployed a malicious contract matching a whitelisted claimer address, passed authentication checks via the claim() function, and drained approximately $140,000 USDT (amplified with a ~$25K Balancer V2 flash loan).ExpandCollapse

Ink Finance’s Workspace Treasury Proxy contract on Polygon was exploited due to a whitelist validation logic flaw. The attacker deployed a malicious contract matching a whitelisted claimer address, passed authentication checks via the claim() function, and drained approximately $140,000 USDT (amplified with a ~$25K Balancer V2 flash loan).

Amount of loss
$ 140,000
Attack method
Smart Contract Vulnerability
Polygon EcosystemSecurity
Keith Gill’s (Roaring Kitty) verified X account was apparently hacked on May 11, 2026. Attackers posted the contract address of a newly launched Solana meme coin $RKC (Red Kitten Crew) on Pump.fun, along with related images. This briefly pumped the token’s market cap to around $11-12 million. The posts were deleted within an hour, causing a 90%+ crash. The developer used 10 wallets to acquire ~39.52% of the supply (with ~$1,950 investment) and dumped for over $611K profit. Over 80 wallets lost approximately $2.86 million in total. Keith Gill has not issued any statement regarding the incident.ExpandCollapse

Keith Gill’s (Roaring Kitty) verified X account was apparently hacked on May 11, 2026. Attackers posted the contract address of a newly launched Solana meme coin $RKC (Red Kitten Crew) on Pump.fun, along with related images. This briefly pumped the token’s market cap to around $11-12 million. The posts were deleted within an hour, causing a 90%+ crash. The developer used 10 wallets to acquire ~39.52% of the supply (with ~$1,950 investment) and dumped for over $611K profit. Over 80 wallets lost approximately $2.86 million in total. Keith Gill has not issued any statement regarding the incident.

Amount of loss
0
Attack method
The X account was hacked
Solana EcosystemSecurity
Following a security incident, TAC identified an exploit on the TON side of its cross-chain layer carried out by an external attacker. The incident resulted in a loss of approximately $2.8M across USDT, BLUM, and tsTON. The TAC token, TON, and all ERC-20 tokens bridged from Ethereum are NOT affected. The bridge remains paused while forensic analysis and remediation are ongoing. A post-mortem will be published soon. The team is working with law enforcement and security partners to trace funds and plans to make users whole via a structured sale of Foundation TAC token reserves.ExpandCollapse

Following a security incident, TAC identified an exploit on the TON side of its cross-chain layer carried out by an external attacker. The incident resulted in a loss of approximately $2.8M across USDT, BLUM, and tsTON. The TAC token, TON, and all ERC-20 tokens bridged from Ethereum are NOT affected. The bridge remains paused while forensic analysis and remediation are ongoing. A post-mortem will be published soon. The team is working with law enforcement and security partners to trace funds and plans to make users whole via a structured sale of Foundation TAC token reserves.

Amount of loss
$ 2,854,000
Attack method
Smart Contract Vulnerability
ETH EcosystemSecurity

May 10, 2026

1 verified update
Renegade’s legacy V1 deployment on Arbitrum was exploited. The attacker took advantage of an unprotected initializer in the Dark Pool proxy contract (combined with a faulty migration from April 2025 that left the version counter out of sync), injected malicious logic, and used delegatecall to drain approximately $209,000 worth of 27 different ERC-20 tokens from the proxy contract’s storage. The exploiter, acting as a whitehat, negotiated on-chain with the team. Renegade offered a 90/10 split (return 90%, keep 10% as a whitehat bounty, no legal action). The whitehat returned ~$190,000 within 45 minutes. The team confirmed the issue was isolated to the V1 Arbitrum deployment (which has been paused), all other deployments are safe, and all affected users will be made whole.ExpandCollapse

Renegade’s legacy V1 deployment on Arbitrum was exploited. The attacker took advantage of an unprotected initializer in the Dark Pool proxy contract (combined with a faulty migration from April 2025 that left the version counter out of sync), injected malicious logic, and used delegatecall to drain approximately $209,000 worth of 27 different ERC-20 tokens from the proxy contract’s storage. The exploiter, acting as a whitehat, negotiated on-chain with the team. Renegade offered a 90/10 split (return 90%, keep 10% as a whitehat bounty, no legal action). The whitehat returned ~$190,000 within 45 minutes. The team confirmed the issue was isolated to the V1 Arbitrum deployment (which has been paused), all other deployments are safe, and all affected users will be made whole.

Amount of loss
$ 209,000
Attack method
Smart Contract Vulnerability
ETH EcosystemSecurity