Digital Asset
Intelligence

Hacked Event Broadcast

Live source archive

Verified blockchain security incidents with original evidence and historical event dates.

Filters

Historical events use their original event dates. Latest event dates first. Severity follows existing archive classifications.

Dec 11, 2025

2 verified updates
According to an announcement by Almanak, during today’s airdrop, operational errors and a DDoS attack caused delays in claims and failures in wallet deployment. The claim function was originally scheduled to open at 12:15 UTC, but was actually delayed until 12:35 UTC. About 1,100 users encountered a “PENDING” status issue while creating wallets.The team has restored the system, cleared the backlog, and confirmed that users’ tokens remain safe and intact.ExpandCollapse

According to an announcement by Almanak, during today’s airdrop, operational errors and a DDoS attack caused delays in claims and failures in wallet deployment. The claim function was originally scheduled to open at 12:15 UTC, but was actually delayed until 12:35 UTC. About 1,100 users encountered a “PENDING” status issue while creating wallets.The team has restored the system, cleared the backlog, and confirmed that users’ tokens remain safe and intact.

Attack method
DDoS Attack
WalletSecurity

Dec 4, 2025

2 verified updates
According to cybersecurity firm Blockaid, the official website of the meme coin PEPE was compromised by attackers, who modified the website’s front-end code, causing users visiting the site to be redirected to a malicious page.ExpandCollapse

According to cybersecurity firm Blockaid, the official website of the meme coin PEPE was compromised by attackers, who modified the website’s front-end code, causing users visiting the site to be redirected to a malicious page.

Attack method
Supply Chain Attack
OtherSecurity
According to PeckShieldAlert, the stablecoin project USPD has suffered a major security breach, resulting in approximately $1 million in losses. The USPD team later confirmed that the protocol had been exploited, with the attacker minting tokens without authorization and draining liquidity. The official team has urgently advised users to revoke all token approvals granted to the USPD contract. According to the project’s confirmation, the incident was identified as a “CPIMP” attack. During the deployment phase, the attacker used Multicall3 to preemptively initialize the proxy and seize administrator privileges, while disguising the malicious implementation as an audited contract. The hidden logic remained dormant for several months before being activated, allowing the attacker to upgrade the proxy, mint approximately 98 million USPD tokens, and transfer around 232 stETH. The USPD team has disclosed the attacker addresses (Infector: 0x7C97…9d83, Drainer: 0x0833…215A) and stated that they are working with law enforcement and white-hat partners to trace the funds. The team has also offered a 10% bounty if the attacker returns the stolen assets.ExpandCollapse

According to PeckShieldAlert, the stablecoin project USPD has suffered a major security breach, resulting in approximately $1 million in losses. The USPD team later confirmed that the protocol had been exploited, with the attacker minting tokens without authorization and draining liquidity. The official team has urgently advised users to revoke all token approvals granted to the USPD contract. According to the project’s confirmation, the incident was identified as a “CPIMP” attack. During the deployment phase, the attacker used Multicall3 to preemptively initialize the proxy and seize administrator privileges, while disguising the malicious implementation as an audited contract. The hidden logic remained dormant for several months before being activated, allowing the attacker to upgrade the proxy, mint approximately 98 million USPD tokens, and transfer around 232 stETH. The USPD team has disclosed the attacker addresses (Infector: 0x7C97…9d83, Drainer: 0x0833…215A) and stated that they are working with law enforcement and white-hat partners to trace the funds. The team has also offered a 10% bounty if the attacker returns the stolen assets.

Amount of loss
$ 1,000,000
Attack method
"CPIMP" (Clandestine Proxy In the Middle of Proxy) attack
OtherSecurity

Dec 3, 2025

1 verified update
According to Finance Feeds, hackers exploited a vulnerability in the React JavaScript library to inject code into websites that steals funds from cryptocurrency wallets, primarily targeting cryptocurrency platforms. On December 3, the React team released a patch for CVE-2025-55182, a vulnerability that allowed unauthenticated code to execute on remote computers. The React team strongly advised all affected modules to upgrade immediately to prevent further exploitation.ExpandCollapse

According to Finance Feeds, hackers exploited a vulnerability in the React JavaScript library to inject code into websites that steals funds from cryptocurrency wallets, primarily targeting cryptocurrency platforms. On December 3, the React team released a patch for CVE-2025-55182, a vulnerability that allowed unauthenticated code to execute on remote computers. The React team strongly advised all affected modules to upgrade immediately to prevent further exploitation.

Attack method
Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
OtherSecurity

Dec 2, 2025

1 verified update
The on-chain private fund Goldfinch’s old contract on Ethereum (0x0689) contained a vulnerability. Because the user deltatiger.eth did not revoke the authorization in time, they were exploited and lost approximately USD 330,000. The attacker has already sent 118 ETH (around USD 329,000) into the privacy mixer Tornado Cash.ExpandCollapse

The on-chain private fund Goldfinch’s old contract on Ethereum (0x0689) contained a vulnerability. Because the user deltatiger.eth did not revoke the authorization in time, they were exploited and lost approximately USD 330,000. The attacker has already sent 118 ETH (around USD 329,000) into the privacy mixer Tornado Cash.

Amount of loss
$ 330,000
Attack method
contract vulnerability
ETH EcosystemSecurity

Nov 30, 2025

1 verified update
According to PeckShieldAlert on X, Yearn Finance suffered an attack in which the hacker drained the liquidity pool by infinitely minting yETH, causing losses of roughly $9 million. Approximately 1,000 ETH (about $3 million) was transferred to Tornado Cash, while the attacker’s address still holds around $6 million worth of crypto assets. On December 1, according to PeckShield’s monitoring, Yearn recovered 2.4 million USD by burning the pxETH held by the hacker. An equivalent amount of pxETH has been re-minted and returned to the Redacted Cartel multisig wallet.ExpandCollapse

According to PeckShieldAlert on X, Yearn Finance suffered an attack in which the hacker drained the liquidity pool by infinitely minting yETH, causing losses of roughly $9 million. Approximately 1,000 ETH (about $3 million) was transferred to Tornado Cash, while the attacker’s address still holds around $6 million worth of crypto assets. On December 1, according to PeckShield’s monitoring, Yearn recovered 2.4 million USD by burning the pxETH held by the hacker. An equivalent amount of pxETH has been re-minted and returned to the Redacted Cartel multisig wallet.

Amount of loss
$ 9,000,000
Attack method
Contract Vulnerability
ETH EcosystemSecurity

Nov 27, 2025

1 verified update
Upbit CEO Woo Kyung-sik issued a public statement regarding the recent security breach and apologized to users, noting that the incident resulted from shortcomings in Upbit’s internal security management. On the morning of the 27th, Upbit detected abnormal withdrawals from its Solana-based wallets, prompting an immediate full-scale inspection of related networks and wallet systems. During the investigation, the team identified a vulnerability that could potentially be exploited to infer private keys, which has since been patched. To safeguard user assets, Upbit suspended all cryptocurrency deposits and withdrawals and initiated on-chain tracking and asset-freezing procedures for funds transferred externally. On December 6, after completing the replacement of all virtual asset wallets and strengthening security controls, Upbit restored full deposit and withdrawal services. According to current estimates, the total value affected by the incident is approximately KRW 44.5 billion (about USD 30.3 million). Of this amount, approximately KRW 38.6 billion (about USD 26.33 million) belongs to users, and KRW 2.3 billion (about USD 1.57 million) has been successfully frozen. Upbit’s own funds affected total approximately KRW 5.9 billion (about USD 4.02 million). On December 8, Upbit’s operating company Dunamu provided an update, stating that an additional KRW 2.6 billion (approximately USD 1.77 million) in compromised assets has now been frozen. Recovery procedures are currently in progress to ensure the secured funds can be safely reclaimed. On January 8, according to MistTrack monitoring, the attacker behind the Upbit hack (address starting with 0x93A0) is continuously transferring funds to Tornado Cash. So far, 1,400 ETH have been moved.ExpandCollapse

Upbit CEO Woo Kyung-sik issued a public statement regarding the recent security breach and apologized to users, noting that the incident resulted from shortcomings in Upbit’s internal security management. On the morning of the 27th, Upbit detected abnormal withdrawals from its Solana-based wallets, prompting an immediate full-scale inspection of related networks and wallet systems. During the investigation, the team identified a vulnerability that could potentially be exploited to infer private keys, which has since been patched. To safeguard user assets, Upbit suspended all cryptocurrency deposits and withdrawals and initiated on-chain tracking and asset-freezing procedures for funds transferred externally. On December 6, after completing the replacement of all virtual asset wallets and strengthening security controls, Upbit restored full deposit and withdrawal services. According to current estimates, the total value affected by the incident is approximately KRW 44.5 billion (about USD 30.3 million). Of this amount, approximately KRW 38.6 billion (about USD 26.33 million) belongs to users, and KRW 2.3 billion (about USD 1.57 million) has been successfully frozen. Upbit’s own funds affected total approximately KRW 5.9 billion (about USD 4.02 million). On December 8, Upbit’s operating company Dunamu provided an update, stating that an additional KRW 2.6 billion (approximately USD 1.77 million) in compromised assets has now been frozen. Recovery procedures are currently in progress to ensure the secured funds can be safely reclaimed. On January 8, according to MistTrack monitoring, the attacker behind the Upbit hack (address starting with 0x93A0) is continuously transferring funds to Tornado Cash. So far, 1,400 ETH have been moved.

Amount of loss
$ 30,300,000
Attack method
Unknown
ETH EcosystemSecurity

Nov 24, 2025

1 verified update
BasisOS disclosed on X: “Due to a security breach, the Agentic FoF was compromised, resulting in approximately USD 531,000 in leaked funds. All vaults have now been suspended, and withdrawals from the Agentic FoF have also been paused pending the results of an internal investigation.”ExpandCollapse

BasisOS disclosed on X: “Due to a security breach, the Agentic FoF was compromised, resulting in approximately USD 531,000 in leaked funds. All vaults have now been suspended, and withdrawals from the Agentic FoF have also been paused pending the results of an internal investigation.”

Amount of loss
$ 531,000
Attack method
Unknown
OtherSecurity

Nov 23, 2025

1 verified update
The decentralized AI data network Port3 Network disclosed on X that its token PORT3 was maliciously minted by a hacker exploiting a cross-chain bridge vulnerability. According to on-chain analyst Yujin, the attacker used a contract flaw in the BridgeIn cross-chain bridge to mint 1 billion PORT3 tokens. The hacker then sold 162.75 million of these tokens on-chain, receiving 199.5 BNB (approximately USD 166,000) and causing the PORT3 price to plunge by 76%. Port3 Network later released an incident report explaining that the root cause stemmed from its use of NEXA Network’s CATERC20 cross-chain token solution. CATERC20 contains a boundary-condition validation vulnerability: after token ownership is renounced, a key function returns a value of 0, which unintentionally satisfies the ownership check condition. This results in permission verification failure, allowing attackers to perform privileged operations—including unauthorized token minting—without proper authorization. Notably, this issue was not identified in the CATERC20 audit report. Since Port3 had previously renounced ownership of the token to achieve greater decentralization, it remained vulnerable to this flaw. Following the incident, the Port3 team urgently removed the remaining on-chain liquidity, and several centralized exchanges suspended PORT3 deposits. Unable to continue selling, the attacker burned the remaining 837.25 million unsold PORT3 tokens approximately 40 minutes earlier.ExpandCollapse

The decentralized AI data network Port3 Network disclosed on X that its token PORT3 was maliciously minted by a hacker exploiting a cross-chain bridge vulnerability. According to on-chain analyst Yujin, the attacker used a contract flaw in the BridgeIn cross-chain bridge to mint 1 billion PORT3 tokens. The hacker then sold 162.75 million of these tokens on-chain, receiving 199.5 BNB (approximately USD 166,000) and causing the PORT3 price to plunge by 76%. Port3 Network later released an incident report explaining that the root cause stemmed from its use of NEXA Network’s CATERC20 cross-chain token solution. CATERC20 contains a boundary-condition validation vulnerability: after token ownership is renounced, a key function returns a value of 0, which unintentionally satisfies the ownership check condition. This results in permission verification failure, allowing attackers to perform privileged operations—including unauthorized token minting—without proper authorization. Notably, this issue was not identified in the CATERC20 audit report. Since Port3 had previously renounced ownership of the token to achieve greater decentralization, it remained vulnerable to this flaw. Following the incident, the Port3 team urgently removed the remaining on-chain liquidity, and several centralized exchanges suspended PORT3 deposits. Unable to continue selling, the attacker burned the remaining 837.25 million unsold PORT3 tokens approximately 40 minutes earlier.

Amount of loss
$ 830,000
Attack method
Contract Vulnerability
ETH EcosystemSecurity

Nov 21, 2025

1 verified update
Aerodrome, a DEX built on Base, posted on X that the centralized domains of Velodrome and Aerodrome were hijacked on November 21 due to an internal security vulnerability at NameSilo, resulting in redirection to malicious content. With the rapid response from security partners including Blockaid, Groom Lake, Security Alliance, and FTI Consulting, MetaMask and Coinbase Wallet displayed warnings within two minutes, and the issue was fully mitigated within four hours. The incident resulted in approximately $700,000 in losses.ExpandCollapse

Aerodrome, a DEX built on Base, posted on X that the centralized domains of Velodrome and Aerodrome were hijacked on November 21 due to an internal security vulnerability at NameSilo, resulting in redirection to malicious content. With the rapid response from security partners including Blockaid, Groom Lake, Security Alliance, and FTI Consulting, MetaMask and Coinbase Wallet displayed warnings within two minutes, and the issue was fully mitigated within four hours. The incident resulted in approximately $700,000 in losses.

Amount of loss
$ 700,000
Attack method
Domain Hijacking
WalletSecurity

Nov 20, 2025

3 verified updates
GoPlus has issued a security alert: Users who claimed the DMT airdrop from @dexmaxai are advised to revoke approvals immediately or transfer their assets to a secure wallet. Multiple victims reported today that they were tricked into granting approvals for other tokens during the DMT airdrop process, resulting in over a thousand users being compromised and more than USD 130,000 in assets stolen via cross-chain transfers. The official website and Twitter account of @dexmaxai are now offline, indicating a possible rug pull. Investigations show that attackers prompted users to sign additional transactions during the airdrop claim, thereby obtaining malicious token approvals and subsequently transferring the approved assets. After stealing funds, attackers bridged the assets to Ethereum, with most of the stolen funds flowing into HitBTC, while a smaller portion remains on-chain.ExpandCollapse

GoPlus has issued a security alert: Users who claimed the DMT airdrop from @dexmaxai are advised to revoke approvals immediately or transfer their assets to a secure wallet. Multiple victims reported today that they were tricked into granting approvals for other tokens during the DMT airdrop process, resulting in over a thousand users being compromised and more than USD 130,000 in assets stolen via cross-chain transfers. The official website and Twitter account of @dexmaxai are now offline, indicating a possible rug pull. Investigations show that attackers prompted users to sign additional transactions during the airdrop claim, thereby obtaining malicious token approvals and subsequently transferring the approved assets. After stealing funds, attackers bridged the assets to Ethereum, with most of the stolen funds flowing into HitBTC, while a smaller portion remains on-chain.

Amount of loss
$ 130,000
Attack method
Phishing Attack
ETH EcosystemSecurity
According to on-chain security analyst ZachXBT, the payment project GANA Payment on the BSC chain was attacked a few hours ago, resulting in an estimated loss of $3.1 million. The attacker has deposited 1,140 BNB (around $1.04 million) into Tornado Cash on BSC, and transferred funds to Ethereum via a cross-chain bridge. Of these funds, 346.8 ETH (around $1.05 million) has also been deposited into Tornado Cash on Ethereum. Currently, another 346 ETH (about $1.046 million) remains idle in an Ethereum address starting with 0x7a.ExpandCollapse

According to on-chain security analyst ZachXBT, the payment project GANA Payment on the BSC chain was attacked a few hours ago, resulting in an estimated loss of $3.1 million. The attacker has deposited 1,140 BNB (around $1.04 million) into Tornado Cash on BSC, and transferred funds to Ethereum via a cross-chain bridge. Of these funds, 346.8 ETH (around $1.05 million) has also been deposited into Tornado Cash on Ethereum. Currently, another 346 ETH (about $1.046 million) remains idle in an Ethereum address starting with 0x7a.

Amount of loss
$ 3,100,000
Attack method
Unknown
ETH EcosystemSecurity
According to a WLFI announcement, prior to the platform’s official launch, some user wallets were compromised due to phishing attacks or mnemonic phrase leaks. WLFI emphasized that the incident was not caused by any platform or smart contract vulnerability, but originated from third-party security issues. The team has developed new smart contract logic that allows assets to be reassigned to secure new wallets after completing KYC verification. Wallets that have not submitted a request or failed verification will remain frozen, though users can initiate the recovery process through customer support. According to Emmett Gallic, World Liberty Fi burned a total of 166.67 million WLFI tokens (worth approximately $22.14 million) from a suspected compromised wallet and reallocated an equal amount of tokens to a new secure address.ExpandCollapse

According to a WLFI announcement, prior to the platform’s official launch, some user wallets were compromised due to phishing attacks or mnemonic phrase leaks. WLFI emphasized that the incident was not caused by any platform or smart contract vulnerability, but originated from third-party security issues. The team has developed new smart contract logic that allows assets to be reassigned to secure new wallets after completing KYC verification. Wallets that have not submitted a request or failed verification will remain frozen, though users can initiate the recovery process through customer support. According to Emmett Gallic, World Liberty Fi burned a total of 166.67 million WLFI tokens (worth approximately $22.14 million) from a suspected compromised wallet and reallocated an equal amount of tokens to a new secure address.

Attack method
Phishing Attack & Private Key Leakage
WalletSecurity

Nov 17, 2025

1 verified update
SlowMist founder Cos reminded users of the NOFX AI open-source automated trading system to be aware of potential security risks. Although the NOFX AI open-source work has shown good intentions, real theft incidents have already occurred, and some users’ wallet private keys as well as CEX/DEX API keys have been leaked as a result. Cos confirmed that this vulnerability also affects the wallet private key security of Aster users. He stated that SlowMist has collaborated with relevant security teams to notify affected users as much as possible to help reduce risks, and advised users to stay vigilant and take timely security measures.ExpandCollapse

SlowMist founder Cos reminded users of the NOFX AI open-source automated trading system to be aware of potential security risks. Although the NOFX AI open-source work has shown good intentions, real theft incidents have already occurred, and some users’ wallet private keys as well as CEX/DEX API keys have been leaked as a result. Cos confirmed that this vulnerability also affects the wallet private key security of Aster users. He stated that SlowMist has collaborated with relevant security teams to notify affected users as much as possible to help reduce risks, and advised users to stay vigilant and take timely security measures.

Attack method
Private Key Leakage
WalletSecurity

Nov 14, 2025

1 verified update
Sui’s official X account issued a reminder stating that the X account of Aftermath, a liquid staking protocol in the Sui ecosystem, has been compromised. Users are advised not to interact with the account until the team regains control.ExpandCollapse

Sui’s official X account issued a reminder stating that the X account of Aftermath, a liquid staking protocol in the Sui ecosystem, has been compromised. Users are advised not to interact with the account until the team regains control.

Attack method
Account Compromise
OtherSecurity

Nov 13, 2025

1 verified update
According to Arkham’s monitoring, an attacker allegedly carried out a deliberate exploit against HLP (Hyperliquidity Provider) on Hyperliquid. The attacker used 19 wallets and $3 million in principal to open a leveraged long position worth $20–30 million on POPCAT with 5× leverage, while placing large buy walls to support the price. Subsequently, the attacker suddenly removed the buy walls, causing a flash crash in POPCAT’s price and triggering the liquidation of their $3 million collateral to zero. Due to the lack of liquidity, HLP was forced to absorb the position, ultimately resulting in a bad debt loss of $4.9 million. Analyst @mlmabc noted that losing $3 million within seconds was not a mistake or negligence, but rather a deliberate attack targeting both HLP and Hyperliquid.ExpandCollapse

According to Arkham’s monitoring, an attacker allegedly carried out a deliberate exploit against HLP (Hyperliquidity Provider) on Hyperliquid. The attacker used 19 wallets and $3 million in principal to open a leveraged long position worth $20–30 million on POPCAT with 5× leverage, while placing large buy walls to support the price. Subsequently, the attacker suddenly removed the buy walls, causing a flash crash in POPCAT’s price and triggering the liquidation of their $3 million collateral to zero. Due to the lack of liquidity, HLP was forced to absorb the position, ultimately resulting in a bad debt loss of $4.9 million. Analyst @mlmabc noted that losing $3 million within seconds was not a mistake or negligence, but rather a deliberate attack targeting both HLP and Hyperliquid.

Amount of loss
$ 4,950,000
Attack method
Price Manipulation
OtherSecurity

Nov 11, 2025

1 verified update
According to a post by crypto trader @25usdc, hackers are exploiting the comment section of Polymarket to carry out scam activities, resulting in losses exceeding $500,000. The attackers post links to their phishing websites in an obfuscated, non-plain-text format. When users log in to these sites via email, malicious scripts are injected, leading to data breaches and the loss of funds.ExpandCollapse

According to a post by crypto trader @25usdc, hackers are exploiting the comment section of Polymarket to carry out scam activities, resulting in losses exceeding $500,000. The attackers post links to their phishing websites in an obfuscated, non-plain-text format. When users log in to these sites via email, malicious scripts are injected, leading to data breaches and the loss of funds.

Amount of loss
$ 500,000
Attack method
Phishing attack
OtherSecurity

Nov 4, 2025

1 verified update
According to CertiK’s monitoring, the Moonwell lending contract suffered multiple attack transactions. The attacker exploited an incorrect oracle price for wrst (around USD 5.8 million). By using a flash loan of only about 0.02 wrstETH and depositing it, the attacker repeatedly borrowed over 20 wstETH, gaining 295 ETH (approximately USD 1 million) in profit.ExpandCollapse

According to CertiK’s monitoring, the Moonwell lending contract suffered multiple attack transactions. The attacker exploited an incorrect oracle price for wrst (around USD 5.8 million). By using a flash loan of only about 0.02 wrstETH and depositing it, the attacker repeatedly borrowed over 20 wstETH, gaining 295 ETH (approximately USD 1 million) in profit.

Amount of loss
$ 1,000,000
Attack method
Oracle Attack
ETH EcosystemSecurity

Nov 3, 2025

2 verified updates
The DeFi protocol Balancer V2 suffered a vulnerability exploit that affected its Composable Stable Pools. The root cause of the incident was an incorrect rounding direction in the Stable Pool’s “exact-out” swap path. This flaw was amplified under conditions of precision errors introduced by rate providers and extremely low liquidity, allowing the attacker to manipulate the invariant and distort the BPT price calculation. As a result, the attacker was able to withdraw large amounts of assets from the pool at a cost far below their real value.The attack caused a total loss of $121.1 million across Ethereum, Arbitrum, Base, Optimism, and Polygon. As of November 19, coordinated mitigation efforts enabled several security measures to be deployed promptly after the issue was discovered, resulting in approximately $45.7 million in user funds being protected or recovered.ExpandCollapse

The DeFi protocol Balancer V2 suffered a vulnerability exploit that affected its Composable Stable Pools. The root cause of the incident was an incorrect rounding direction in the Stable Pool’s “exact-out” swap path. This flaw was amplified under conditions of precision errors introduced by rate providers and extremely low liquidity, allowing the attacker to manipulate the invariant and distort the BPT price calculation. As a result, the attacker was able to withdraw large amounts of assets from the pool at a cost far below their real value.The attack caused a total loss of $121.1 million across Ethereum, Arbitrum, Base, Optimism, and Polygon. As of November 19, coordinated mitigation efforts enabled several security measures to be deployed promptly after the issue was discovered, resulting in approximately $45.7 million in user funds being protected or recovered.

Amount of loss
$ 121,100,000
Attack method
Business Logic Flaw
ETH EcosystemSecurity
Berachain announced that approximately USD 12.8 million in funds lost due to the BEX/Balancer v2 vulnerability have been fully returned to the Berachain Foundation’s deployer address, and the blockchain has now resumed normal operations.ExpandCollapse

Berachain announced that approximately USD 12.8 million in funds lost due to the BEX/Balancer v2 vulnerability have been fully returned to the Berachain Foundation’s deployer address, and the blockchain has now resumed normal operations.

Amount of loss
$ 12,800,000
Attack method
Contract Vulnerability
BlockchainSecurity