Digital Asset
Intelligence

Hacked Event Broadcast

Live source archive

Verified blockchain security incidents with original evidence and historical event dates.

Filters

Historical events use their original event dates. Latest event dates first. Severity follows existing archive classifications.

Jun 18, 2025

1 verified update
The Iran-based Nobitex cryptocurrency exchange suffered a $90 million hack, and the attacker has also promised to imminently release data and source code from the platform. The hacking group appears to have burned the crypto assets, effectively destroying them rather than taking them for their own profits. Gonjeshke Darande (also "Predatory Sparrow"), a hacking group with links to Israel, claimed responsibility for the theft, accusing the platform of serving as a "key regime tool" to finance terror and violate sanctions.ExpandCollapse

The Iran-based Nobitex cryptocurrency exchange suffered a $90 million hack, and the attacker has also promised to imminently release data and source code from the platform. The hacking group appears to have burned the crypto assets, effectively destroying them rather than taking them for their own profits. Gonjeshke Darande (also "Predatory Sparrow"), a hacking group with links to Israel, claimed responsibility for the theft, accusing the platform of serving as a "key regime tool" to finance terror and violate sanctions.

Amount of loss
$ 90,000,000
Attack method
Unknown
ExchangeSecurity

Jun 17, 2025

1 verified update
An attacker exploited a vulnerability in the staking contract for Meta Pool, which is a liquid staking project. This allowed them to mint 9,700 mpETH, the project's liquid staking token, which is notionally worth $27 million. However, very low liquidity for the token meant that the attacker was only able to swap 10 ETH (~$25,000) of tokens.ExpandCollapse

An attacker exploited a vulnerability in the staking contract for Meta Pool, which is a liquid staking project. This allowed them to mint 9,700 mpETH, the project's liquid staking token, which is notionally worth $27 million. However, very low liquidity for the token meant that the attacker was only able to swap 10 ETH (~$25,000) of tokens.

Amount of loss
$ 25,000
Attack method
Contract Vulnerability
ETH EcosystemSecurity

Jun 14, 2025

1 verified update
Echo Protocol, a project built on the Bitcoin ecosystem, has experienced a compromise of its official X (formerly Twitter) account. Users are advised to refrain from interacting with any recent posts or links and to await official updates through verified channels.ExpandCollapse

Echo Protocol, a project built on the Bitcoin ecosystem, has experienced a compromise of its official X (formerly Twitter) account. Users are advised to refrain from interacting with any recent posts or links and to await official updates through verified channels.

Attack method
Account Compromise
OtherSecurity

Jun 7, 2025

1 verified update
The official ether.fi Discord was hacked, and fraudulent messages containing scam links were posted. ether.fi urges users not to interact with any links within the Discord.ExpandCollapse

The official ether.fi Discord was hacked, and fraudulent messages containing scam links were posted. ether.fi urges users not to interact with any links within the Discord.

Attack method
Account Compromise
OtherSecurity

Jun 6, 2025

1 verified update
On June 6, 2025, ALEX Protocol was attacked due to a vulnerability in its on-chain self-listing verification logic, which is constrained by limitations on Stacks. As a result, multiple asset pools were drained, with total losses amounting to approximately $8.37 million.ExpandCollapse

On June 6, 2025, ALEX Protocol was attacked due to a vulnerability in its on-chain self-listing verification logic, which is constrained by limitations on Stacks. As a result, multiple asset pools were drained, with total losses amounting to approximately $8.37 million.

Amount of loss
$ 8,370,000
Attack method
Contract Vulnerability
OtherSecurity

Jun 1, 2025

2 verified updates
The Force Bridge, a cross-chain bridge on the Nervos Network, is suspected to have been compromised, with approximately $3.7 million in assets stolen. The Nervos team has urgently suspended all contracts and is actively investigating the incident. According to the incident investigation report, malicious code was discovered in one of the Docker images. The code had been injected into Ethereum-related modules and was not part of the public source code — instead, it was embedded through a locally built Docker image.ExpandCollapse

The Force Bridge, a cross-chain bridge on the Nervos Network, is suspected to have been compromised, with approximately $3.7 million in assets stolen. The Nervos team has urgently suspended all contracts and is actively investigating the incident. According to the incident investigation report, malicious code was discovered in one of the Docker images. The code had been injected into Ethereum-related modules and was not part of the public source code — instead, it was embedded through a locally built Docker image.

Amount of loss
$ 3,700,000
Attack method
Supply Chain Attack
ETH EcosystemSecurity
MegaETH stated that its X (formerly Twitter) account has been compromised, warning users not to click on any links or view recent posts.ExpandCollapse

MegaETH stated that its X (formerly Twitter) account has been compromised, warning users not to click on any links or view recent posts.

Attack method
Account Compromise
OtherSecurity

May 30, 2025

1 verified update
The vulnerability originated in the Migrator.sol contract. The contract allowed the Mendi Comptroller address to be passed dynamically, rather than being hardcoded. This enabled the attacker to supply their own malicious Comptroller, mint a synthetic position on Malda, and withdraw approximately $285,000.ExpandCollapse

The vulnerability originated in the Migrator.sol contract. The contract allowed the Mendi Comptroller address to be passed dynamically, rather than being hardcoded. This enabled the attacker to supply their own malicious Comptroller, mint a synthetic position on Malda, and withdraw approximately $285,000.

Amount of loss
$ 285,000
Attack method
Contract Vulnerability
Solana EcosystemSecurity

May 28, 2025

1 verified update
On May 28, SlowMist detected potential suspicious activity related to Cork Protocol. According to the SlowMist security team’s analysis, the root cause of the attack was the lack of strict validation on user-supplied data, allowing the protocol’s liquidity to be manipulated and transferred to unintended markets, which attackers then exploited to perform unauthorized redemptions and profit illegally.ExpandCollapse

On May 28, SlowMist detected potential suspicious activity related to Cork Protocol. According to the SlowMist security team’s analysis, the root cause of the attack was the lack of strict validation on user-supplied data, allowing the protocol’s liquidity to be manipulated and transferred to unintended markets, which attackers then exploited to perform unauthorized redemptions and profit illegally.

Amount of loss
$ 12,000,000
Attack method
Contract Vulnerability
OtherSecurity

May 27, 2025

1 verified update
According to monitoring by SlowMist, Usual Protocol suffered a sophisticated arbitrage attack. The attacker exploited a price discrepancy between the protocol’s internal mechanisms and external markets. The core issue lay in the Vault system, which allowed a fixed 1:1 exchange between USD0++ and USD0—despite the two tokens trading at different prices on decentralized exchanges. The attacker strategically created a custom liquidity pool and manipulated the transaction path to trick the Vault into releasing USD0 tokens without receiving the expected sUSDS collateral. These USD0 tokens were then sold on external markets at prices higher than the internal rate, allowing the attacker to profit through arbitrage.ExpandCollapse

According to monitoring by SlowMist, Usual Protocol suffered a sophisticated arbitrage attack. The attacker exploited a price discrepancy between the protocol’s internal mechanisms and external markets. The core issue lay in the Vault system, which allowed a fixed 1:1 exchange between USD0++ and USD0—despite the two tokens trading at different prices on decentralized exchanges. The attacker strategically created a custom liquidity pool and manipulated the transaction path to trick the Vault into releasing USD0 tokens without receiving the expected sUSDS collateral. These USD0 tokens were then sold on external markets at prices higher than the internal rate, allowing the attacker to profit through arbitrage.

Amount of loss
$ 42,800
Attack method
Contract Vulnerability
ExchangeSecurity

May 22, 2025

2 verified updates
On May 22, according to community reports, the SUI ecosystem’s liquidity provider Cetus Protocol was reportedly attacked. Liquidity pool depth dropped sharply, and multiple token pairs on Cetus experienced significant price declines. The estimated losses exceed $230 million. The project announced shortly after that $162 million of the funds had been frozen.ExpandCollapse

On May 22, according to community reports, the SUI ecosystem’s liquidity provider Cetus Protocol was reportedly attacked. Liquidity pool depth dropped sharply, and multiple token pairs on Cetus experienced significant price declines. The estimated losses exceed $230 million. The project announced shortly after that $162 million of the funds had been frozen.

Amount of loss
$ 230,000,000
Attack method
Contract Vulnerability
ExchangeSecurity
According to monitoring by the SlowMist security team, the digital asset wealth management platform Nexo suffered a sandwich attack due to a lack of access control in one of its contracts, resulting in a loss of approximately $31,000.ExpandCollapse

According to monitoring by the SlowMist security team, the digital asset wealth management platform Nexo suffered a sandwich attack due to a lack of access control in one of its contracts, resulting in a loss of approximately $31,000.

Amount of loss
$ 31,535
Attack method
Contract Vulnerability
OtherSecurity

May 16, 2025

1 verified update
On May 16th, Demex's lending market Nitron was exploited, resulting in a loss of $950,559 in user funds. According to Demex's post-incident analysis, the root cause of the exploit was a donation-based oracle manipulation attack targeting the deprecated dGLP vault.ExpandCollapse

On May 16th, Demex's lending market Nitron was exploited, resulting in a loss of $950,559 in user funds. According to Demex's post-incident analysis, the root cause of the exploit was a donation-based oracle manipulation attack targeting the deprecated dGLP vault.

Amount of loss
$ 950,559
Attack method
Price Manipulation
OtherSecurity

May 15, 2025

1 verified update
Zunami Protocol has reported a hack in which the collateral for zunUSD and zunETH was stolen, resulting in a loss of approximately $500,000. The attacker has transferred the stolen funds to Tornado Cash.ExpandCollapse

Zunami Protocol has reported a hack in which the collateral for zunUSD and zunETH was stolen, resulting in a loss of approximately $500,000. The attacker has transferred the stolen funds to Tornado Cash.

Amount of loss
$ 500,000
Attack method
Unknown
OtherSecurity

May 13, 2025

1 verified update
ZKsync Developers posted on X that the official X accounts of both ZKsync and Matter Labs have been compromised. Please do not interact with these accounts or click on any related links.ExpandCollapse

ZKsync Developers posted on X that the official X accounts of both ZKsync and Matter Labs have been compromised. Please do not interact with these accounts or click on any related links.

Attack method
Account Compromise
zkSync EcosystemSecurity

May 12, 2025

1 verified update
The English football club @SheffieldUnited has confirmed that its official X account was hacked. The attacker posted a Solana token address.ExpandCollapse

The English football club @SheffieldUnited has confirmed that its official X account was hacked. The attacker posted a Solana token address.

Attack method
Account Compromise
Solana EcosystemSecurity

May 11, 2025

1 verified update
Mobius Token on BSC is suspected to have been exploited, with estimated losses of $2.15 million.ExpandCollapse

Mobius Token on BSC is suspected to have been exploited, with estimated losses of $2.15 million.

Amount of loss
$ 2,150,000
Attack method
Contract Vulnerability
BSC EcosystemSecurity

May 10, 2025

1 verified update
Cointelegraph’s official X account was reportedly compromised and used to send phishing links to contributors on the platform. Crypto KOL @thedefiedge reported receiving a DM from the account, asking him to review an article that allegedly mentioned him. When he clicked the link in a private browsing window, it prompted an X login — but the domain was “Cointetegraph,” a misspelled version of Cointelegraph. Previously, there were also market reports that Cointelegraph’s account had posted an on-chain token contract and disabled comments. That post has since been deleted.ExpandCollapse

Cointelegraph’s official X account was reportedly compromised and used to send phishing links to contributors on the platform. Crypto KOL @thedefiedge reported receiving a DM from the account, asking him to review an article that allegedly mentioned him. When he clicked the link in a private browsing window, it prompted an X login — but the domain was “Cointetegraph,” a misspelled version of Cointelegraph. Previously, there were also market reports that Cointelegraph’s account had posted an on-chain token contract and disabled comments. That post has since been deleted.

Attack method
Account Compromise
OtherSecurity

May 8, 2025

1 verified update
According to on-chain investigator ZachXBT, crypto exchange BitoPro was reportedly hacked on May 8, 2025, resulting in losses of approximately $11.5 million. The attacker drained assets from BitoPro’s hot wallets on Tron, Ethereum, Solana, and Polygon, then sold them via DEXs. The stolen funds were subsequently laundered through Tornado Cash or bridged via Thorchain to the Bitcoin network, eventually ending up in a Wasabi Wallet. BitoPro stated that the tactics used in this incident closely resemble those seen in several major international cases, attributing the attack to the North Korean hacking group Lazarus.ExpandCollapse

According to on-chain investigator ZachXBT, crypto exchange BitoPro was reportedly hacked on May 8, 2025, resulting in losses of approximately $11.5 million. The attacker drained assets from BitoPro’s hot wallets on Tron, Ethereum, Solana, and Polygon, then sold them via DEXs. The stolen funds were subsequently laundered through Tornado Cash or bridged via Thorchain to the Bitcoin network, eventually ending up in a Wasabi Wallet. BitoPro stated that the tactics used in this incident closely resemble those seen in several major international cases, attributing the attack to the North Korean hacking group Lazarus.

Amount of loss
$ 11,500,000
Attack method
Malicious Software
ETH EcosystemSecurity

May 5, 2025

1 verified update
Curve Finance’s official website and X account were compromised in quick succession. On May 5, attackers first took control of the project’s X account and used it to post a phishing message promoting a fake airdrop. Then on May 12, the project issued a warning that the Curve frontend had been “hijacked,” in what appeared to be a domain takeover incident.ExpandCollapse

Curve Finance’s official website and X account were compromised in quick succession. On May 5, attackers first took control of the project’s X account and used it to post a phishing message promoting a fake airdrop. Then on May 12, the project issued a warning that the Curve frontend had been “hijacked,” in what appeared to be a domain takeover incident.

Attack method
Account Compromise
OtherSecurity