Digital Asset
Intelligence

Hacked Event Broadcast

Live source archive

Verified blockchain security incidents with original evidence and historical event dates.

Filters

Historical events use their original event dates. Latest event dates first. Severity follows existing archive classifications.

Feb 25, 2024

2 verified updates
RiskOnBlast, a gambling and trading platform on the new ethereum layer-2 Blast blockchain, appears to be a rug pull. On February 25, the platform drained more than 420 ETH (~$1.3 million) from more than 750 user wallets on their platform.ExpandCollapse

RiskOnBlast, a gambling and trading platform on the new ethereum layer-2 Blast blockchain, appears to be a rug pull. On February 25, the platform drained more than 420 ETH (~$1.3 million) from more than 750 user wallets on their platform.

Amount of loss
$ 1,300,000
Attack method
Rug Pull
ETH EcosystemSecurity
SlowMist founder Cos tweeted that there is a backdoor code in the Tornado Cash IPFS version frontend that hijacks deposit certificates. A governance attack led to malicious proposals being passed, and the malicious code has been present for about two months.ExpandCollapse

SlowMist founder Cos tweeted that there is a backdoor code in the Tornado Cash IPFS version frontend that hijacks deposit certificates. A governance attack led to malicious proposals being passed, and the malicious code has been present for about two months.

Attack method
Governance Attack
OtherSecurity

Feb 24, 2024

1 verified update
ZoomerCoin on Ethereum suffered a flash loan attack, resulting in a loss of 14.06 ETH (~ $41k).ExpandCollapse

ZoomerCoin on Ethereum suffered a flash loan attack, resulting in a loss of 14.06 ETH (~ $41k).

Amount of loss
$ 41,000
Attack method
Flash Loan Attack
ETH EcosystemSecurity

Feb 23, 2024

4 verified updates
On February 23rd, the Avalanche mainnet experienced block production interruptions. Addressing this issue, Ava Labs co-founder Kevin Sekniqi stated on Twitter that the problem appears to be a gossip-related mempool management error, which is purely a code-related issue, not a performance handling problem. It seems that inscriptions have reached an edge case, but they did not affect performance. The mainnet downtime issue appears to be related to an edge-case bug in mempool processing, and bug fix testing is currently underway on the Avalanche testnet. On February 24th, Ava Labs engineering lead Patrick O'Grady tweeted that nodes need to be upgraded to AvalancheGo version 1.11.1, which disables the logic added in v1.10.18 that caused validators to send excessive amounts of gossip to each other. Avalanche Validators provision a stake-weighted bandwidth allocation for each peer, and this flawed logic led each node to saturate their allocation with useless transaction gossip. This dynamic prevented pull queries issued by validators from being processed in a timely manner and resulted in consensus stalling.ExpandCollapse

On February 23rd, the Avalanche mainnet experienced block production interruptions. Addressing this issue, Ava Labs co-founder Kevin Sekniqi stated on Twitter that the problem appears to be a gossip-related mempool management error, which is purely a code-related issue, not a performance handling problem. It seems that inscriptions have reached an edge case, but they did not affect performance. The mainnet downtime issue appears to be related to an edge-case bug in mempool processing, and bug fix testing is currently underway on the Avalanche testnet. On February 24th, Ava Labs engineering lead Patrick O'Grady tweeted that nodes need to be upgraded to AvalancheGo version 1.11.1, which disables the logic added in v1.10.18 that caused validators to send excessive amounts of gossip to each other. Avalanche Validators provision a stake-weighted bandwidth allocation for each peer, and this flawed logic led each node to saturate their allocation with useless transaction gossip. This dynamic prevented pull queries issued by validators from being processed in a timely manner and resulted in consensus stalling.

Attack method
Security Vulnerability
Avalanche EcosystemSecurity
On February 23, 2024, Hong Kong-based cryptocurrency exchange BitForex was suspected of an exit scam after approximately $56.5 million in suspicious fund outflows were detected across multiple blockchains. The platform subsequently restricted access. On-chain investigator ZachXBT was the first to notice irregularities in withdrawals, highlighting that the exchange had ceased processing withdrawals and failed to respond to customers. In mid-2023, the company faced regulatory scrutiny in Japan for operating without a license and was accused of inflating trading volumes. Its CEO resigned in January, promising a new team would take over. On July 19, BitForex updated the situation on X, stating that platform access was disrupted due to unforeseen events and that it would reopen soon.ExpandCollapse

On February 23, 2024, Hong Kong-based cryptocurrency exchange BitForex was suspected of an exit scam after approximately $56.5 million in suspicious fund outflows were detected across multiple blockchains. The platform subsequently restricted access. On-chain investigator ZachXBT was the first to notice irregularities in withdrawals, highlighting that the exchange had ceased processing withdrawals and failed to respond to customers. In mid-2023, the company faced regulatory scrutiny in Japan for operating without a license and was accused of inflating trading volumes. Its CEO resigned in January, promising a new team would take over. On July 19, BitForex updated the situation on X, stating that platform access was disrupted due to unforeseen events and that it would reopen soon.

Amount of loss
$ 56,500,000
Attack method
Unknown
ExchangeSecurity
On the evening of February 23rd, UNI experienced a sudden price surge, causing Compound to fail in promptly updating UNI's price. As a result, the protocol used an incorrect price provided by Uniswap's TWAP (Time-Weighted Average Price). This allowed users to borrow UNI using collateral with a lower value than UNI's actual price, leading to $660,000 in bad debt.ExpandCollapse

On the evening of February 23rd, UNI experienced a sudden price surge, causing Compound to fail in promptly updating UNI's price. As a result, the protocol used an incorrect price provided by Uniswap's TWAP (Time-Weighted Average Price). This allowed users to borrow UNI using collateral with a lower value than UNI's actual price, leading to $660,000 in bad debt.

Amount of loss
$ 660,000
Attack method
Security Vulnerability
OtherSecurity
Axie Infinity co-founder Jihoz tweeted that his personal two addresses have been compromised. The attack is limited to his personal accounts and is unrelated to the validation or operation of the Ronin chain. Additionally, the leaked keys are unrelated to the operations of Sky Mavis. He reassured everyone that strict security measures have been taken for all related activities.ExpandCollapse

Axie Infinity co-founder Jihoz tweeted that his personal two addresses have been compromised. The attack is limited to his personal accounts and is unrelated to the validation or operation of the Ronin chain. Additionally, the leaked keys are unrelated to the operations of Sky Mavis. He reassured everyone that strict security measures have been taken for all related activities.

Amount of loss
$ 10,000,000
Attack method
Private Key Leakage
OtherSecurity

Feb 22, 2024

1 verified update
DeFi leverage project Blueberry Protocol was exploited for approximately $1.35 million. However, the attack was intercepted by a white hat, c0ffeebabe.eth. 366 ETH has already been returned to Blueberry. The vulnerability stemmed from the incorrect handling of decimals by the lending contract. This attack occurred due to a faulty oracle deployment.ExpandCollapse

DeFi leverage project Blueberry Protocol was exploited for approximately $1.35 million. However, the attack was intercepted by a white hat, c0ffeebabe.eth. 366 ETH has already been returned to Blueberry. The vulnerability stemmed from the incorrect handling of decimals by the lending contract. This attack occurred due to a faulty oracle deployment.

Amount of loss
$ 1,350,000
Attack method
Oracle Misconfiguration
ETH EcosystemSecurity

Feb 20, 2024

1 verified update
The official Twitter account of ARPA, a permissionless threshold network based on the BLS signature scheme, has been compromised, and false token claiming links have been posted.ExpandCollapse

The official Twitter account of ARPA, a permissionless threshold network based on the BLS signature scheme, has been compromised, and false token claiming links have been posted.

Attack method
Account Compromise
BlockchainSecurity

Feb 19, 2024

1 verified update
The ERC 404 project Rugged Art was attacked due to a reentrancy vulnerability, resulting in a loss of 11 ETH.ExpandCollapse

The ERC 404 project Rugged Art was attacked due to a reentrancy vulnerability, resulting in a loss of 11 ETH.

Amount of loss
$ 32,395
Attack method
Reentrancy Attack
ETH EcosystemSecurity

Feb 18, 2024

1 verified update
On February 18th, Starcoin, a project within the Move ecosystem, tweeted that they detected abnormal activities on their network that required immediate attention to safeguard the integrity and security of the system. As a precautionary measure, Starcoin has temporarily suspended our network to conduct a thorough investigation together with SlowMist.ExpandCollapse

On February 18th, Starcoin, a project within the Move ecosystem, tweeted that they detected abnormal activities on their network that required immediate attention to safeguard the integrity and security of the system. As a precautionary measure, Starcoin has temporarily suspended our network to conduct a thorough investigation together with SlowMist.

Attack method
Unknown
BlockchainSecurity

Feb 16, 2024

2 verified updates
According to on-chain data, the cryptocurrency exchange FixedFloat appears to have been exploited, resulting in the theft of approximately $26.1 million worth of Bitcoin and Ethereum. On February 18th, FixedFloat tweeted: "We confirm that there was indeed a hack and theft of funds. We are not yet ready to make public comments on this matter, as we are working to eliminate all possible vulnerabilities, improve security, and investigate. Our service will be available again soon. We will provide details on this case a little later."ExpandCollapse

According to on-chain data, the cryptocurrency exchange FixedFloat appears to have been exploited, resulting in the theft of approximately $26.1 million worth of Bitcoin and Ethereum. On February 18th, FixedFloat tweeted: "We confirm that there was indeed a hack and theft of funds. We are not yet ready to make public comments on this matter, as we are working to eliminate all possible vulnerabilities, improve security, and investigate. Our service will be available again soon. We will provide details on this case a little later."

Amount of loss
$ 26,100,000
Attack method
Third-party Vulnerability
ETH EcosystemSecurity
The CEO of SocialFi xPET tweeted that SocialFi was attacked due to vulnerabilities related to the newly launched PvP feature, resulting in hackers stealing 91.5 ETH (approximately $25,400).ExpandCollapse

The CEO of SocialFi xPET tweeted that SocialFi was attacked due to vulnerabilities related to the newly launched PvP feature, resulting in hackers stealing 91.5 ETH (approximately $25,400).

Amount of loss
$ 254,000
Attack method
Contract Vulnerability
ETH EcosystemSecurity

Feb 14, 2024

2 verified updates
The hot wallet of the crypto gambling platform Duelbits was attacked, resulting in a loss of approximately $4.6 million.ExpandCollapse

The hot wallet of the crypto gambling platform Duelbits was attacked, resulting in a loss of approximately $4.6 million.

Amount of loss
$ 4,600,000
Attack method
Private Key Leakage
WalletSecurity
The ERC-X protocol Miner (MINER) has been attacked, please do not interact. According to the Miner team's analysis, the _update function of the contract was exploited. The root cause of this exploit is a double-transfer vulnerability caused by a lack of input validation.ExpandCollapse

The ERC-X protocol Miner (MINER) has been attacked, please do not interact. According to the Miner team's analysis, the _update function of the contract was exploited. The root cause of this exploit is a double-transfer vulnerability caused by a lack of input validation.

Amount of loss
$ 466,000
Attack method
Contract Vulnerability
OtherSecurity

Feb 9, 2024

3 verified updates
Keith Grossman, the president of MoonPay, currently has a compromised X account distributing wallet drainer links.ExpandCollapse

Keith Grossman, the president of MoonPay, currently has a compromised X account distributing wallet drainer links.

Attack method
Account Compromise
WalletSecurity
The Not Found (404) project on ETH is suspected to have exited with losses of approximately $156,000, as the deployer withdrew a large amount of liquidity.ExpandCollapse

The Not Found (404) project on ETH is suspected to have exited with losses of approximately $156,000, as the deployer withdrew a large amount of liquidity.

Amount of loss
$ 156,000
Attack method
Rug Pull
ETH EcosystemSecurity
The blockchain gaming platform PlayDapp was hacked, with the attacker's address being added as a minter, minting 200 million PLA tokens (valued at $36.5 million). Shortly after the incident, PlayDapp sent a message to the attacker through on-chain transactions, requesting the return of the stolen funds and offering a $1 million bug bounty reward, but negotiations ultimately failed. On February 12, the hacker minted an additional 1.59 billion PLA tokens, valued at $253.9 million, and began transferring them through cryptocurrency trading platforms. On February 13, PlayDapp announced on Twitter that the PLA smart contract had been paused, while also advising users to cease trading for migration snapshots and stating that every effort is being made to protect holders' assets.ExpandCollapse

The blockchain gaming platform PlayDapp was hacked, with the attacker's address being added as a minter, minting 200 million PLA tokens (valued at $36.5 million). Shortly after the incident, PlayDapp sent a message to the attacker through on-chain transactions, requesting the return of the stolen funds and offering a $1 million bug bounty reward, but negotiations ultimately failed. On February 12, the hacker minted an additional 1.59 billion PLA tokens, valued at $253.9 million, and began transferring them through cryptocurrency trading platforms. On February 13, PlayDapp announced on Twitter that the PLA smart contract had been paused, while also advising users to cease trading for migration snapshots and stating that every effort is being made to protect holders' assets.

Amount of loss
$ 290,000,000
Attack method
Private Key Leakage
ExchangeSecurity

Feb 8, 2024

1 verified update
A critical security incident within the Starlay protocol’s USDC lending pool on the Acala EVM platform. An exploit was identified and executed due to abnormal behavior in the liquidity index calculation mechanism, which allowed an attacker to withdraw an amount far exceeding their original deposit after borrowing LDOT.ExpandCollapse

A critical security incident within the Starlay protocol’s USDC lending pool on the Acala EVM platform. An exploit was identified and executed due to abnormal behavior in the liquidity index calculation mechanism, which allowed an attacker to withdraw an amount far exceeding their original deposit after borrowing LDOT.

Amount of loss
$ 2,100,000
Attack method
Contract Vulnerability
OtherSecurity

Feb 2, 2024

2 verified updates
The project Detto Finance in the Base ecosystem is suspected of a rug pull, with its social media accounts currently inaccessible, resulting in approximately $95,000 in losses.ExpandCollapse

The project Detto Finance in the Base ecosystem is suspected of a rug pull, with its social media accounts currently inaccessible, resulting in approximately $95,000 in losses.

Amount of loss
$ 94,147
Attack method
Rug Pull
Base EcosystemSecurity