Digital Asset
Intelligence

Hacked Event Broadcast

Live source archive

Verified blockchain security incidents with original evidence and historical event dates.

Filters

Historical events use their original event dates. Latest event dates first. Severity follows existing archive classifications.

Nov 29, 2023

3 verified updates
Virtual Asset Platform HOUNAX Investigated for Fraud. On November 1, HOUNAX was placed by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) on a warning list of "Suspicious Virtual Asset Trading Platforms," which is designed to alert investors to risks. On November 29, Hong Kong police reported that 158 Hong Kong investors had been lured by the unlicensed platform HOUNAX and lost approximately HK$155 million ($19.83 million).ExpandCollapse

Virtual Asset Platform HOUNAX Investigated for Fraud. On November 1, HOUNAX was placed by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) on a warning list of "Suspicious Virtual Asset Trading Platforms," which is designed to alert investors to risks. On November 29, Hong Kong police reported that 158 Hong Kong investors had been lured by the unlicensed platform HOUNAX and lost approximately HK$155 million ($19.83 million).

Amount of loss
$ 19,830,000
Attack method
Scam
ExchangeSecurity
Optimism decentralized trading protocol Velodrome tweeted that the frontend is currently compromised, please do not interact with Velodrome for the time being, the team is investigating. On December 1, Velodrome posted an update stating, "We are happy to announce that earlier today we were able to regain control of our domain following a social engineering attack on our provider. We are still working to restore our primary domain and will share an update soon. More details on the attack + response will follow." On December 2, Velodrome tweeted that their provider was exploited again and please do not interact with our front end. On the same day, Velodrome stated that "the domain has been restored again and is locked at the TLD level pending transfer to a new provider. You can now resume using https://velodrome.finance. Our decentralized frontend can be accessed at http://velo.drome.eth.limo and has remained uncompromised."ExpandCollapse

Optimism decentralized trading protocol Velodrome tweeted that the frontend is currently compromised, please do not interact with Velodrome for the time being, the team is investigating. On December 1, Velodrome posted an update stating, "We are happy to announce that earlier today we were able to regain control of our domain following a social engineering attack on our provider. We are still working to restore our primary domain and will share an update soon. More details on the attack + response will follow." On December 2, Velodrome tweeted that their provider was exploited again and please do not interact with our front end. On the same day, Velodrome stated that "the domain has been restored again and is locked at the TLD level pending transfer to a new provider. You can now resume using https://velodrome.finance. Our decentralized frontend can be accessed at http://velo.drome.eth.limo and has remained uncompromised."

Amount of loss
$ 250,000
Attack method
DNS Hijacking Attack
ETH EcosystemSecurity

Nov 28, 2023

2 verified updates
AssetClub (ACC) on ETH is suspected of a rug pull, with the deployer removing substantial liquidity, causing a 100% price decline.ExpandCollapse

AssetClub (ACC) on ETH is suspected of a rug pull, with the deployer removing substantial liquidity, causing a 100% price decline.

Amount of loss
$ 84,423
Attack method
Rug Pull
ETH EcosystemSecurity
Symbiogenesis (SYSIS) on ETH is suspected of a rug pull, with the deployer removing substantial liquidity, causing a 100% price decline.ExpandCollapse

Symbiogenesis (SYSIS) on ETH is suspected of a rug pull, with the deployer removing substantial liquidity, causing a 100% price decline.

Amount of loss
$ 54,086
Attack method
Rug Pull
ETH EcosystemSecurity

Nov 27, 2023

1 verified update
Expanso (EXPSO) on ETH is suspected of a rug pull, with the deployer removing substantial liquidity, causing a 100% price decline.ExpandCollapse

Expanso (EXPSO) on ETH is suspected of a rug pull, with the deployer removing substantial liquidity, causing a 100% price decline.

Amount of loss
$ 87,317
Attack method
Rug Pull
ETH EcosystemSecurity

Nov 24, 2023

1 verified update
CJewels (JWL) on ETH is suspected of a rug pull, with the deployer removing substantial liquidity, causing a 100% price decline.ExpandCollapse

CJewels (JWL) on ETH is suspected of a rug pull, with the deployer removing substantial liquidity, causing a 100% price decline.

Amount of loss
$ 65,784
Attack method
Rug Pull
ETH EcosystemSecurity

Nov 23, 2023

13 verified updates
AISurf (AISC) on BSC is suspected of a rug pull, with the deployer removing substantial liquidity, causing a 100% price decline.ExpandCollapse

AISurf (AISC) on BSC is suspected of a rug pull, with the deployer removing substantial liquidity, causing a 100% price decline.

Amount of loss
$ 237,074
Attack method
Rug Pull
BSC EcosystemSecurity
Changpeng Zhao (CZ) on BSC is suspected of a rug pull, with the deployer removing substantial liquidity, causing a 100% price decline.ExpandCollapse

Changpeng Zhao (CZ) on BSC is suspected of a rug pull, with the deployer removing substantial liquidity, causing a 100% price decline.

Amount of loss
$ 302,028
Attack method
Rug Pull
BSC EcosystemSecurity
Creso (CRE) on BSC is suspected of a rug pull, with the deployer removing substantial liquidity, causing a 100% price decline.ExpandCollapse

Creso (CRE) on BSC is suspected of a rug pull, with the deployer removing substantial liquidity, causing a 100% price decline.

Amount of loss
$ 233,693
Attack method
Rug Pull
BSC EcosystemSecurity
DarkProtocol (DARK) on BSC is suspected of a rug pull, with the deployer removing substantial liquidity, causing a 100% price decline.ExpandCollapse

DarkProtocol (DARK) on BSC is suspected of a rug pull, with the deployer removing substantial liquidity, causing a 100% price decline.

Amount of loss
$ 230,833
Attack method
Rug Pull
BSC EcosystemSecurity
DigiFund (DFUND) on BSC is suspected of a rug pull, with the deployer removing substantial liquidity, causing a 100% price decline.ExpandCollapse

DigiFund (DFUND) on BSC is suspected of a rug pull, with the deployer removing substantial liquidity, causing a 100% price decline.

Amount of loss
$ 237,894
Attack method
Rug Pull
BSC EcosystemSecurity
Fake TrustPad (TPAD) on BSC is suspected of a rug pull, with the deployer removing substantial liquidity, causing a 100% price decline.ExpandCollapse

Fake TrustPad (TPAD) on BSC is suspected of a rug pull, with the deployer removing substantial liquidity, causing a 100% price decline.

Amount of loss
$ 240,006
Attack method
Rug Pull
BSC EcosystemSecurity
Dor (DOR) on BSC is suspected of a rug pull, with the deployer removing substantial liquidity, causing a 100% price decline.ExpandCollapse

Dor (DOR) on BSC is suspected of a rug pull, with the deployer removing substantial liquidity, causing a 100% price decline.

Amount of loss
$ 240,270
Attack method
Rug Pull
BSC EcosystemSecurity
Lido officials say that over the course of the last 24 hours, Lido DAO contributors were made aware of a platform vulnerability that affected an active Node Operator using the Lido on Ethereum protocol (InfStones) sometime over the course of the previous few months. The vulnerability was disclosed to InfStones in July 2023 by security researchers dWallet Labs. The Node Operator has announced that the vulnerability has been 184 addressed. The vulnerability is related to the possible exposure of root-level access to 25 validator servers that may not be related to the Lido protocol, including possibly key material, to external attackers. It is not clear to contributors at this time if servers and/or keys related to Lido validators were included in the scope of affected systems or not.ExpandCollapse

Lido officials say that over the course of the last 24 hours, Lido DAO contributors were made aware of a platform vulnerability that affected an active Node Operator using the Lido on Ethereum protocol (InfStones) sometime over the course of the previous few months. The vulnerability was disclosed to InfStones in July 2023 by security researchers dWallet Labs. The Node Operator has announced that the vulnerability has been 184 addressed. The vulnerability is related to the possible exposure of root-level access to 25 validator servers that may not be related to the Lido protocol, including possibly key material, to external attackers. It is not clear to contributors at this time if servers and/or keys related to Lido validators were included in the scope of affected systems or not.

Attack method
Third-party Vulnerability
ETH EcosystemSecurity
IPMB (IPMB) on BSC is suspected of a rug pull, with the deployer removing substantial liquidity, causing a 100% price decline.ExpandCollapse

IPMB (IPMB) on BSC is suspected of a rug pull, with the deployer removing substantial liquidity, causing a 100% price decline.

Amount of loss
$ 232,074
Attack method
Rug Pull
BSC EcosystemSecurity
Kyber Network tweeted that KyberSwap Elastic has experienced a security incident. According to the analysis of the SlowMist security team, the root cause of this attack is that in calculating the number of tokens needed for the exchange from the current price to the boundary scale price, the liquidity will be added to the portion of the fee compounding because of KyberSwap Elastic's reinvestment curve, thus causing its calculation result to be larger than expected, which can cover the user's need for exchange, but the actual price has already crossed the boundary scale, which makes the protocol think that the liquidity within the current scale has already met the need for exchange, and therefore does not carry out liquidity update. The protocol assumes that the liquidity within the current scale is sufficient to cover the redemption needs, and therefore does not update the liquidity. The result is that the liquidity is increased twice when the reverse exchange crosses the boundary scale, allowing the attacker to obtain more tokens than expected. On Nov. 27, the Kyber Network tweeted that the KyberSwap team had contacted the owner of the frontrun bots that had withdrawn approximately $5.7 million from the KyberSwap pool on Polygon and Avalanche. After negotiations, the owners of the frontrun bots have agreed to return 90% of their users' funds to a designated address. In return, they will receive a 10% bounty. On December 13th, the KyberSwap team recovered approximately $508,000 worth of funds from the owners of frontrun bots. To date, the total amount of funds returned by the owners of frontrun bots is approximately $5.17 million.ExpandCollapse

Kyber Network tweeted that KyberSwap Elastic has experienced a security incident. According to the analysis of the SlowMist security team, the root cause of this attack is that in calculating the number of tokens needed for the exchange from the current price to the boundary scale price, the liquidity will be added to the portion of the fee compounding because of KyberSwap Elastic's reinvestment curve, thus causing its calculation result to be larger than expected, which can cover the user's need for exchange, but the actual price has already crossed the boundary scale, which makes the protocol think that the liquidity within the current scale has already met the need for exchange, and therefore does not carry out liquidity update. The protocol assumes that the liquidity within the current scale is sufficient to cover the redemption needs, and therefore does not update the liquidity. The result is that the liquidity is increased twice when the reverse exchange crosses the boundary scale, allowing the attacker to obtain more tokens than expected. On Nov. 27, the Kyber Network tweeted that the KyberSwap team had contacted the owner of the frontrun bots that had withdrawn approximately $5.7 million from the KyberSwap pool on Polygon and Avalanche. After negotiations, the owners of the frontrun bots have agreed to return 90% of their users' funds to a designated address. In return, they will receive a 10% bounty. On December 13th, the KyberSwap team recovered approximately $508,000 worth of funds from the owners of frontrun bots. To date, the total amount of funds returned by the owners of frontrun bots is approximately $5.17 million.

Amount of loss
$ 54,700,000
Attack method
Liquidity Exploit
Polygon EcosystemSecurity
PAPABEAR (PAPA) on BSC is suspected of a rug pull, with the deployer removing substantial liquidity, causing a 100% price decline.ExpandCollapse

PAPABEAR (PAPA) on BSC is suspected of a rug pull, with the deployer removing substantial liquidity, causing a 100% price decline.

Amount of loss
$ 235,249
Attack method
Rug Pull
BSC EcosystemSecurity
RepubliK (RPK) on BSC is suspected of a rug pull, with the deployer removing substantial liquidity, causing a 100% price decline.ExpandCollapse

RepubliK (RPK) on BSC is suspected of a rug pull, with the deployer removing substantial liquidity, causing a 100% price decline.

Amount of loss
$ 235,995
Attack method
Rug Pull
BSC EcosystemSecurity
Web (WEB) on BSC is suspected of a rug pull, with the deployer removing substantial liquidity, causing a 100% price decline.ExpandCollapse

Web (WEB) on BSC is suspected of a rug pull, with the deployer removing substantial liquidity, causing a 100% price decline.

Amount of loss
$ 217,791
Attack method
Rug Pull
BSC EcosystemSecurity

Nov 22, 2023

1 verified update
HTX (formerly Huobi) and its related Heco Bridge were hacked for a combined $113.3 million.ExpandCollapse

HTX (formerly Huobi) and its related Heco Bridge were hacked for a combined $113.3 million.

Amount of loss
$ 113,300,000
Attack method
Unknown
HECO EcosystemSecurity