Digital Asset
Intelligence

Hacked Event Broadcast

Live source archive

Verified blockchain security incidents with original evidence and historical event dates.

Filters

Historical events use their original event dates. Latest event dates first. Severity follows existing archive classifications.

Mar 13, 2023

6 verified updates
SwissBorg is a crypto asset management platform that is regulated and licensed in Switzerland, France and Estonia. It has its own SwissBorg app and can earn money through this mobile wallet. SwissBorg stated that the ETH and USDT in the Earn strategy suffered partial losses, including 1617.23 ETH and about 1.69 million USDT, accounting for 2.27% and 29.52% of the subscription funds respectively. SwissBorg will bear all losses.ExpandCollapse

SwissBorg is a crypto asset management platform that is regulated and licensed in Switzerland, France and Estonia. It has its own SwissBorg app and can earn money through this mobile wallet. SwissBorg stated that the ETH and USDT in the Earn strategy suffered partial losses, including 1617.23 ETH and about 1.69 million USDT, accounting for 2.27% and 29.52% of the subscription funds respectively. SwissBorg will bear all losses.

Amount of loss
$ 4,500,000
Attack method
Affected by Euler Finance Attack
ETH EcosystemSecurity

Mar 10, 2023

2 verified updates
Hedera tweeted to disclose the details of the attack. The attacker attacked the smart contract service code of the Hedera main network and transferred the Hedera Token Service tokens held by some user accounts to their own accounts. The attackers targeted accounts used as liquidity pools on multiple DEXs migrated to use the Hedera Token Service using Uniswap V2-derived contract generations, including Pangolin Hedera, SaucerSwap, and HeliSwap. When attackers moved tokens obtained through the attack to a Hashport Network bridge, bridge operators detected the activity and acted quickly to disable it. To prevent attackers from stealing more tokens, Hedera shut down the mainnet proxy, which removes user access to the mainnet.ExpandCollapse

Hedera tweeted to disclose the details of the attack. The attacker attacked the smart contract service code of the Hedera main network and transferred the Hedera Token Service tokens held by some user accounts to their own accounts. The attackers targeted accounts used as liquidity pools on multiple DEXs migrated to use the Hedera Token Service using Uniswap V2-derived contract generations, including Pangolin Hedera, SaucerSwap, and HeliSwap. When attackers moved tokens obtained through the attack to a Hashport Network bridge, bridge operators detected the activity and acted quickly to disable it. To prevent attackers from stealing more tokens, Hedera shut down the mainnet proxy, which removes user access to the mainnet.

Amount of loss
$ 570,000
Attack method
Contract Vulnerability
BridgeSecurity
The SUCKR project on the Aptos chain is suspected of being a rug pull. The hacker called the mint_SUCKR (admin privilege function) function to mint a large number of SUCKR tokens and exchange them for USDT. The price of SUCKR tokens plummeted by 9% 249h.ExpandCollapse

The SUCKR project on the Aptos chain is suspected of being a rug pull. The hacker called the mint_SUCKR (admin privilege function) function to mint a large number of SUCKR tokens and exchange them for USDT. The price of SUCKR tokens plummeted by 9% 249h.

Attack method
Rug Pull
ExchangeSecurity

Mar 7, 2023

1 verified update
Tender.fi is suspected of being attacked by white hat hackers and lost $1.59 million. Hackers used Tender.fi’s misconfigured oracles to borrow $1.59 million worth of crypto assets with just $70 worth of GMX tokens as collateral. On March 8, on-chain data showed that the hackers who attacked the Arbitrum ecological lending protocol Tender.fi had returned their funds, and the Tender.fi team agreed to pay the hackers 62 ETH ($96,500) as a bounty.ExpandCollapse

Tender.fi is suspected of being attacked by white hat hackers and lost $1.59 million. Hackers used Tender.fi’s misconfigured oracles to borrow $1.59 million worth of crypto assets with just $70 worth of GMX tokens as collateral. On March 8, on-chain data showed that the hackers who attacked the Arbitrum ecological lending protocol Tender.fi had returned their funds, and the Tender.fi team agreed to pay the hackers 62 ETH ($96,500) as a bounty.

Amount of loss
$ 1,590,000
Attack method
Oracle Attack
ETH EcosystemSecurity

Mar 6, 2023

1 verified update
When PeopleDAO’s community treasury multi-signature wallet on the digital asset management platform Safe (formerly Gnosis Safe) distributed monthly contributor rewards on March 6, 76 ETH (approximately $120,000) were stolen by hackers through social engineering attacks. This event has nothing to do with the PEOPLE token contract. PeopleDAO collects monthly contributor reward information through Google Form. The person in charge of accounting mistakenly shared a link with editing permissions in the Discord public channel. Payments to your own address and set them to be invisible. Due to the malicious concealment, the team leader did not find it during the review. After downloading the csv file with insertef data, it was submitted to Safe's CSV Airdrop tool for reward distribution. With the assistance of SlowMist and ZachXBT, the team found that the attacked funds had been deposited in two exchanges, HitBTC and Binance, and contacted the two exchanges.ExpandCollapse

When PeopleDAO’s community treasury multi-signature wallet on the digital asset management platform Safe (formerly Gnosis Safe) distributed monthly contributor rewards on March 6, 76 ETH (approximately $120,000) were stolen by hackers through social engineering attacks. This event has nothing to do with the PEOPLE token contract. PeopleDAO collects monthly contributor reward information through Google Form. The person in charge of accounting mistakenly shared a link with editing permissions in the Discord public channel. Payments to your own address and set them to be invisible. Due to the malicious concealment, the team leader did not find it during the review. After downloading the csv file with insertef data, it was submitted to Safe's CSV Airdrop tool for reward distribution. With the assistance of SlowMist and ZachXBT, the team found that the attacked funds had been deposited in two exchanges, HitBTC and Binance, and contacted the two exchanges.

Amount of loss
76 ETH
Attack method
Permission Stolen
ETH EcosystemSecurity

Mar 2, 2023

1 verified update
Arbitrum ecological DEX ArbiSwap is suspected of Rug Pull. ArbiSwap deployers minted 1 trillion ARBI before Rug Pull, and then converted ARBI into USDC, which caused a sharp drop in ARBI in the USDC/ARBI transaction pair. In the next block, the robot passed USDC to ARBI then traded ETH for spatial arbitrage, making a profit of 68.47 ETH. ArbiSwap has transferred 84 ETH to the Ethereum mainnet and sent it to TornadoCash.ExpandCollapse

Arbitrum ecological DEX ArbiSwap is suspected of Rug Pull. ArbiSwap deployers minted 1 trillion ARBI before Rug Pull, and then converted ARBI into USDC, which caused a sharp drop in ARBI in the USDC/ARBI transaction pair. In the next block, the robot passed USDC to ARBI then traded ETH for spatial arbitrage, making a profit of 68.47 ETH. ArbiSwap has transferred 84 ETH to the Ethereum mainnet and sent it to TornadoCash.

Amount of loss
84 ETH
Attack method
Rug Pull
ETH EcosystemSecurity

Mar 1, 2023

1 verified update
According to the official WeChat account of Ping An Xuhui, employees Zhang, Dong, and Liu from Company A decided in early March 2023 to insert a backdoor program into a certain cryptocurrency wallet software to obtain users' private keys. The three individuals illegally obtained over 27,000 mnemonic phrases and more than 10,000 private keys, successfully converting over 19,000 digital wallet addresses. In April 2024, the Xuhui District People's Court sentenced Liu, Zhang, and Dong to three years in prison for the crime of illegally obtaining data from a computer information system and fined each of them 30,000 RMB. It is worth noting that Company A is suspected to be the former Huobi company. In an exclusive report by WuShuo in 2023, it was revealed that due to the installation of trojans by former employees, some users' mnemonic phrases or private keys of iToken (formerly Huobi Wallet) were leaked. HTX responded that the trojan installation was the personal act of former Huobi employees before the acquisition, leading to the theft of others' mnemonic phrases and private keys.ExpandCollapse

According to the official WeChat account of Ping An Xuhui, employees Zhang, Dong, and Liu from Company A decided in early March 2023 to insert a backdoor program into a certain cryptocurrency wallet software to obtain users' private keys. The three individuals illegally obtained over 27,000 mnemonic phrases and more than 10,000 private keys, successfully converting over 19,000 digital wallet addresses. In April 2024, the Xuhui District People's Court sentenced Liu, Zhang, and Dong to three years in prison for the crime of illegally obtaining data from a computer information system and fined each of them 30,000 RMB. It is worth noting that Company A is suspected to be the former Huobi company. In an exclusive report by WuShuo in 2023, it was revealed that due to the installation of trojans by former employees, some users' mnemonic phrases or private keys of iToken (formerly Huobi Wallet) were leaked. HTX responded that the trojan installation was the personal act of former Huobi employees before the acquisition, leading to the theft of others' mnemonic phrases and private keys.

Attack method
Insider Manipulation
WalletSecurity

Feb 28, 2023

1 verified update
Algorand ecological wallet MyAlgo issued a reminder on Twitter that the hack occurred more than a week ago, and no other actions have taken place since then. The attacked users all had large amounts of funds on their accounts and used mnemonic wallets with keys stored in the browser. ZachXBT, an on-chain data analyst, tweeted: “Due to the attack on MyAlgo, Algorand’s ecological wallet, from February 19th to 21st, more than $9.2 million in assets (19.5 million ALGOs, 3.5 million USDCs, etc.) may have been stolen on Algorand. ChangeNow shared that they were able to freeze $1.5 million.”ExpandCollapse

Algorand ecological wallet MyAlgo issued a reminder on Twitter that the hack occurred more than a week ago, and no other actions have taken place since then. The attacked users all had large amounts of funds on their accounts and used mnemonic wallets with keys stored in the browser. ZachXBT, an on-chain data analyst, tweeted: “Due to the attack on MyAlgo, Algorand’s ecological wallet, from February 19th to 21st, more than $9.2 million in assets (19.5 million ALGOs, 3.5 million USDCs, etc.) may have been stolen on Algorand. ChangeNow shared that they were able to freeze $1.5 million.”

Amount of loss
$ 9,200,000
Attack method
Mnemonic Vulnerability
WalletSecurity

Feb 27, 2023

3 verified updates
The DeFi project DND Token (DungeonSwap Token) on BSC has been utilized. The initial funds came from TornadoCash, and the attackers stole over 2,400 BNB (approximately $728,000) from Dungeonswap.ExpandCollapse

The DeFi project DND Token (DungeonSwap Token) on BSC has been utilized. The initial funds came from TornadoCash, and the attackers stole over 2,400 BNB (approximately $728,000) from Dungeonswap.

Amount of loss
$ 728,000
Attack method
Contract Vulnerability
BSC EcosystemSecurity
@HideYoApes previously owned several expensive NFTs from Yuga Labs, including a Bored Ape, Mutant Ape, three Bored Ape Kennel Club NFTs, a SewerPass, and two Otherdeeds. The attacker sold all the NFTs for a profit of 127.3 wETH (~$208,000). HideYoApes explained on Twitter that he had downloaded and installed the MetaMask wallet extension from MetaMask’s official website.ExpandCollapse

@HideYoApes previously owned several expensive NFTs from Yuga Labs, including a Bored Ape, Mutant Ape, three Bored Ape Kennel Club NFTs, a SewerPass, and two Otherdeeds. The attacker sold all the NFTs for a profit of 127.3 wETH (~$208,000). HideYoApes explained on Twitter that he had downloaded and installed the MetaMask wallet extension from MetaMask’s official website.

Amount of loss
$ 208,000
Attack method
Phishing Attack
WalletSecurity
80% of the funds in the liquidity pool of the DeFi project LaunchZone were suddenly drained, the price of LZ tokens fell by more than 80% from the previous value of around US$0.15 to US$0.026, and the stolen funds were about US$700,000.ExpandCollapse

80% of the funds in the liquidity pool of the DeFi project LaunchZone were suddenly drained, the price of LZ tokens fell by more than 80% from the previous value of around US$0.15 to US$0.026, and the stolen funds were about US$700,000.

Amount of loss
$ 700,000
Attack method
Contract Vulnerability
ExchangeSecurity

Feb 26, 2023

1 verified update
According to the official blog, The Sandbox issued a security incident notice on February 26 that an unauthorized third party gained access to the computer of an employee of the team and used its permissions to send a false email claiming to be from The Sandbox . Titled "The Sandbox Game (PURELAND) Access," the email contained hyperlinks to malware that could remotely install malware on a user's computer, granting it control of the computer and access to the user's personal information right. The Sandbox said that after the unauthorized access was discovered, the recipient was notified and the employee's account and access to The Sandbox were disabled, and no further impact has been identified.ExpandCollapse

According to the official blog, The Sandbox issued a security incident notice on February 26 that an unauthorized third party gained access to the computer of an employee of the team and used its permissions to send a false email claiming to be from The Sandbox . Titled "The Sandbox Game (PURELAND) Access," the email contained hyperlinks to malware that could remotely install malware on a user's computer, granting it control of the computer and access to the user's personal information right. The Sandbox said that after the unauthorized access was discovered, the recipient was notified and the employee's account and access to The Sandbox were disabled, and no further impact has been identified.

Attack method
Phishing Attack
OtherSecurity

Feb 25, 2023

1 verified update
As Coindesk reported, the Solana network experienced a fork event that limited users’ ability to execute transactions. According to Solana Explorer, the network was processing about 93 transactions per second at around 2AM ET today, well below the previous network rate of nearly 5000 TPS about 15 minutes ago. Such low throughput has prohibited users from performing activities such as on-chain transactions and transfers on Solana.ExpandCollapse

As Coindesk reported, the Solana network experienced a fork event that limited users’ ability to execute transactions. According to Solana Explorer, the network was processing about 93 transactions per second at around 2AM ET today, well below the previous network rate of nearly 5000 TPS about 15 minutes ago. Such low throughput has prohibited users from performing activities such as on-chain transactions and transfers on Solana.

Attack method
Fork
Solana EcosystemSecurity

Feb 24, 2023

1 verified update
On February 24, 2023, Earning.farm’s USDC vault was exploited and lost about 5.15 million USDC.ExpandCollapse

On February 24, 2023, Earning.farm’s USDC vault was exploited and lost about 5.15 million USDC.

Amount of loss
$ 5,150,000
Attack method
Flash Loan Attack
OtherSecurity

Feb 20, 2023

1 verified update
The AMM liquidity management protocol Revert Finance disclosed on Twitter that its v3utils contract was attacked, and 90% of the funds were stolen from a single account. The stolen assets included: 22983.235188 USDC, 4106.316699 USDT, 485.5786287699002 OP, 0.18217977664322793 WETH, 36.59093198260223 DAI, 211.21463945524238 WMATIC and 22 Premia. At current prices, that's about $29,000.ExpandCollapse

The AMM liquidity management protocol Revert Finance disclosed on Twitter that its v3utils contract was attacked, and 90% of the funds were stolen from a single account. The stolen assets included: 22983.235188 USDC, 4106.316699 USDT, 485.5786287699002 OP, 0.18217977664322793 WETH, 36.59093198260223 DAI, 211.21463945524238 WMATIC and 22 Premia. At current prices, that's about $29,000.

Amount of loss
$ 29,000
Attack method
Contract Vulnerability
OtherSecurity

Feb 19, 2023

1 verified update
The Baby Doll (BABYDOLL) project was hit by a flash loan attack, losing 25 BNB (~$7,900). BSC contract address is 0x449cfecbc8e8469eeda869fca6cccd326ece0c04a1cdd96b23d21f3b599adee2ExpandCollapse

The Baby Doll (BABYDOLL) project was hit by a flash loan attack, losing 25 BNB (~$7,900). BSC contract address is 0x449cfecbc8e8469eeda869fca6cccd326ece0c04a1cdd96b23d21f3b599adee2

Amount of loss
$ 7,900
Attack method
Flash Loan Attack
BSC EcosystemSecurity

Feb 18, 2023

1 verified update
Hackers exploited a vulnerability in the Dexible smart contract code to withdraw funds from crypto wallets using funds approved for spending. The team added that "a small number of whales" lost 85% of the funds stolen in the attack. Data on the chain shows that Block Tower Capital, a digital asset investment company, was one of the victims. The address labeled Block Tower Capital had $1.5 million worth of TRU tokens stolen in this incident. The attackers transferred TRU tokens to SushiSwap for ether (ETH) and then to TornadoCash.ExpandCollapse

Hackers exploited a vulnerability in the Dexible smart contract code to withdraw funds from crypto wallets using funds approved for spending. The team added that "a small number of whales" lost 85% of the funds stolen in the attack. Data on the chain shows that Block Tower Capital, a digital asset investment company, was one of the victims. The address labeled Block Tower Capital had $1.5 million worth of TRU tokens stolen in this incident. The attackers transferred TRU tokens to SushiSwap for ether (ETH) and then to TornadoCash.

Amount of loss
$ 1,500,000
Attack method
Affected by Dexible events
ETH EcosystemSecurity

Feb 17, 2023

2 verified updates
The DEX tool Dexible was suspected of being attacked and lost about $2 million. According to the analysis, there is a logical loophole in the selfSwap function of the Dexible contract, which will call the fill function. This function has a call to the attacker's custom data, and the attacker constructs a transferfrom function in this data, and transfers other users (0x58f5f0684c381fcfc203d77b2bba468ebb29b098) address and its own attack address (0x684083f312ac50f538cc4b634d85a2feafaab77a), causing the tokens authorized by the user to the contract to be transferred by the attacker.ExpandCollapse

The DEX tool Dexible was suspected of being attacked and lost about $2 million. According to the analysis, there is a logical loophole in the selfSwap function of the Dexible contract, which will call the fill function. This function has a call to the attacker's custom data, and the attacker constructs a transferfrom function in this data, and transfers other users (0x58f5f0684c381fcfc203d77b2bba468ebb29b098) address and its own attack address (0x684083f312ac50f538cc4b634d85a2feafaab77a), causing the tokens authorized by the user to the contract to be transferred by the attacker.

Amount of loss
$ 2,000,000
Attack method
Contract Vulnerability
ExchangeSecurity
The stablecoin trading project Platypus encountered a flash loan attack on AAVE, resulting in a total asset loss of approximately $9 million. According to the analysis, the vulnerability seems to lie in the verification of the MasterPlatypusV4 contract by the emergencyWithdraw function, which will only fail when the borrowed assets exceed the borrowing limit. The function then proceeds to transfer all of the user's deposit assets regardless of the value of the user's borrowed assets. On Feb. 18, The Block reported that at least $2.4 million has been recovered with the help of security firms after the Platypus hack.ExpandCollapse

The stablecoin trading project Platypus encountered a flash loan attack on AAVE, resulting in a total asset loss of approximately $9 million. According to the analysis, the vulnerability seems to lie in the verification of the MasterPlatypusV4 contract by the emergencyWithdraw function, which will only fail when the borrowed assets exceed the borrowing limit. The function then proceeds to transfer all of the user's deposit assets regardless of the value of the user's borrowed assets. On Feb. 18, The Block reported that at least $2.4 million has been recovered with the help of security firms after the Platypus hack.

Amount of loss
$ 9,000,000
Attack method
Flash Loan Attack
OtherSecurity

Feb 15, 2023

1 verified update
Multichain's AnyswapV4Router contract suffered a rush attack, and the attacker made a profit of about 87 Ethereum, about $130,000. After analysis, the attacker used the MEV contract (0xd050) to pre-emptively call the anySwapOutUnderlyingWithPermit function of the AnyswapV4Router contract before the normal transaction was executed (the user authorized WETH but has not yet performed the transfer), although the function uses the permit signature of the token verification, but the stolen WETH this time does not have a relevant signature verification function, and only triggers a deposit function in a fallback. In subsequent function calls, the attacker can directly use the safeTransferFrom function to transfer the WETH authorized by the _underlying address to the attacked contract to the attack contract without signature verification.ExpandCollapse

Multichain's AnyswapV4Router contract suffered a rush attack, and the attacker made a profit of about 87 Ethereum, about $130,000. After analysis, the attacker used the MEV contract (0xd050) to pre-emptively call the anySwapOutUnderlyingWithPermit function of the AnyswapV4Router contract before the normal transaction was executed (the user authorized WETH but has not yet performed the transfer), although the function uses the permit signature of the token verification, but the stolen WETH this time does not have a relevant signature verification function, and only triggers a deposit function in a fallback. In subsequent function calls, the attacker can directly use the safeTransferFrom function to transfer the WETH authorized by the _underlying address to the attacked contract to the attack contract without signature verification.

Amount of loss
$ 130,000
Attack method
Rush Attack
ETH EcosystemSecurity