Digital Asset
Intelligence

Hacked Event Broadcast

Live source archive

Verified blockchain security incidents with original evidence and historical event dates.

Filters

Historical events use their original event dates. Latest event dates first. Severity follows existing archive classifications.

Mar 22, 2022

2 verified updates
Twitter user cr0ss.eth said Defiance Capital founder Arthur's hot wallet was suspected to have been stolen. OpenSea data shows that in Arthur's wallet address 0x4C53c32980ccE49aaA4bCc53Eef3f143Bc27E0aF, 60 NFTs including 17 azuki and 5 cloneX were transferred on the chain, totaling about 310 ETH.ExpandCollapse

Twitter user cr0ss.eth said Defiance Capital founder Arthur's hot wallet was suspected to have been stolen. OpenSea data shows that in Arthur's wallet address 0x4C53c32980ccE49aaA4bCc53Eef3f143Bc27E0aF, 60 NFTs including 17 azuki and 5 cloneX were transferred on the chain, totaling about 310 ETH.

Amount of loss
310 ETH
Attack method
Private Key Leakage
ETH EcosystemSecurity
The NFT project REALSWAK has a Rug Pull, and its official social account (@REALSWAK) has been cancelled. Scammers have transferred 1,300 BNB to the TornadoCash mixer.ExpandCollapse

The NFT project REALSWAK has a Rug Pull, and its official social account (@REALSWAK) has been cancelled. Scammers have transferred 1,300 BNB to the TornadoCash mixer.

Amount of loss
1330 BNB
Attack method
Rug Pull
NFTSecurity

Mar 21, 2022

1 verified update
Fantom ecological Stablecoin revenue optimizer OneRing issued a document saying that hackers stole 1,454,672.244369 USDC through flash loan attacks, and the contract has been configured to self-destruct in a specific block, so it is almost impossible to track which specific functions in the contract are called to steal funds. .ExpandCollapse

Fantom ecological Stablecoin revenue optimizer OneRing issued a document saying that hackers stole 1,454,672.244369 USDC through flash loan attacks, and the contract has been configured to self-destruct in a specific block, so it is almost impossible to track which specific functions in the contract are called to steal funds. .

Amount of loss
$ 1,454,672.24
Attack method
Flash loan attack
Fantom EcosystemSecurity

Mar 20, 2022

3 verified updates
Crypto lender BlockFi has confirmed a data breach at Hubspot, one of its third-party vendors, Cointelegragh reported. Hubspot stores BlockFi's user data, including names, email addresses, and phone numbers. According to the announcement, hackers stole BlockFi’s customer data on March 18. Hubspot has confirmed that an unauthorized third party obtained certain BlockFi customer data deposited on its platform. BlockFi is currently cooperating with Hubspot's investigation to clarify the overall impact of the data breach. While the exact details of the stolen data have yet to be identified and disclosed, BlockFi emphasized that data such as passwords, government-issued IDs, and Social Security numbers were never stored on Hubspot.ExpandCollapse

Crypto lender BlockFi has confirmed a data breach at Hubspot, one of its third-party vendors, Cointelegragh reported. Hubspot stores BlockFi's user data, including names, email addresses, and phone numbers. According to the announcement, hackers stole BlockFi’s customer data on March 18. Hubspot has confirmed that an unauthorized third party obtained certain BlockFi customer data deposited on its platform. BlockFi is currently cooperating with Hubspot's investigation to clarify the overall impact of the data breach. While the exact details of the stolen data have yet to be identified and disclosed, BlockFi emphasized that data such as passwords, government-issued IDs, and Social Security numbers were never stored on Hubspot.

Attack method
Information Leakage
OtherSecurity
According to official reports, attackers exploited Li.finance’s smart contracts and managed to steal around $600,000 (currently worth $587,500 or 205 ETH) from 29 wallets. Attackers took various tokens from users’ wallets, including USDC, MATIC, RPL, GNO, USDT, MVI, AUDIO, AAVE, JRT, and DAI. The project team has found the vulnerability and created a fix, compensating most of the affected users in less than 18 hours.ExpandCollapse

According to official reports, attackers exploited Li.finance’s smart contracts and managed to steal around $600,000 (currently worth $587,500 or 205 ETH) from 29 wallets. Attackers took various tokens from users’ wallets, including USDC, MATIC, RPL, GNO, USDT, MVI, AUDIO, AAVE, JRT, and DAI. The project team has found the vulnerability and created a fix, compensating most of the affected users in less than 18 hours.

Amount of loss
$ 600,000
Attack method
Contract Vulnerability
ETH EcosystemSecurity
DeFi oracle Umbrella Network’s Ethereum and BNB Chain (formerly BSC) reward pools were hacked, resulting in the hackers earning around $700,000. The hacker was able to succeed because of an unchecked vulnerability in withdraw() , so anyone could withdraw any amount of funds without having any balance.ExpandCollapse

DeFi oracle Umbrella Network’s Ethereum and BNB Chain (formerly BSC) reward pools were hacked, resulting in the hackers earning around $700,000. The hacker was able to succeed because of an unchecked vulnerability in withdraw() , so anyone could withdraw any amount of funds without having any balance.

Amount of loss
$ 700,000
Attack method
Contract Vulnerability
ETH EcosystemSecurity

Mar 17, 2022

1 verified update
According to a report by Twitter user Will Sheehan, the arbitrage bot took out more than 6w APE Coins (worth $8 each) through flash loans. After analysis, it was found that this was related to a loophole in the airdrop mechanism of APE Coin. Specifically, whether APE Coin can be airdropped depends on whether a user holds the instantaneous state of BYAC NFT, and this instantaneous state attacker can manipulate by borrowing a flash loan and then redeeming to obtain BYAC NFT. The attacker first borrows BYAC Token through flash loan, and then redeems to obtain BYAC NFT. Then use these NFTs to claim the airdropped APE, and finally use the BYAC NFT mint to obtain BYAC Token to return the flash loan.ExpandCollapse

According to a report by Twitter user Will Sheehan, the arbitrage bot took out more than 6w APE Coins (worth $8 each) through flash loans. After analysis, it was found that this was related to a loophole in the airdrop mechanism of APE Coin. Specifically, whether APE Coin can be airdropped depends on whether a user holds the instantaneous state of BYAC NFT, and this instantaneous state attacker can manipulate by borrowing a flash loan and then redeeming to obtain BYAC NFT. The attacker first borrows BYAC Token through flash loan, and then redeems to obtain BYAC NFT. Then use these NFTs to claim the airdropped APE, and finally use the BYAC NFT mint to obtain BYAC Token to return the flash loan.

Amount of loss
$ 500,000
Attack method
Airdrop Mechanism Vulnerability
NFTSecurity

Mar 16, 2022

1 verified update
Hundred Finance, the Compound fork project on the Gnosis chain, tweeted that it suffered a hacker attack and lost more than $6 million.ExpandCollapse

Hundred Finance, the Compound fork project on the Gnosis chain, tweeted that it suffered a hacker attack and lost more than $6 million.

Amount of loss
$ 6,000,000
Attack method
Flash loan attack
OtherSecurity

Mar 15, 2022

2 verified updates
The Agave contract on Gnosis Chain was attacked due to an untrusted external call. The attacker calls the liquidateCall function to liquidate himself without any debt. During the liquidation process, the liquidation contract called the attacker contract. During the process, the attack contract deposited 2728 WETH obtained through the flash loan and minted 2728 aWETH. And use this as collateral to lend out all available assets in the Agave project. After the external call ends, the liquidateCall function directly liquidates the 2728 aWETH previously deposited by the attacker and transfers it to the liquidator.ExpandCollapse

The Agave contract on Gnosis Chain was attacked due to an untrusted external call. The attacker calls the liquidateCall function to liquidate himself without any debt. During the liquidation process, the liquidation contract called the attacker contract. During the process, the attack contract deposited 2728 WETH obtained through the flash loan and minted 2728 aWETH. And use this as collateral to lend out all available assets in the Agave project. After the external call ends, the liquidateCall function directly liquidates the 2728 aWETH previously deposited by the attacker and transfers it to the liquidator.

Amount of loss
$ 5,400,000
Attack method
Flash loan attack
OtherSecurity
DeFi protocol Deus Finance was attacked by a flash loan, and hackers manipulated the price of the oracle machine and stole about $3 million, including 200,000 DAI and 1101.8 ETH through Tornado mixing.ExpandCollapse

DeFi protocol Deus Finance was attacked by a flash loan, and hackers manipulated the price of the oracle machine and stole about $3 million, including 200,000 DAI and 1101.8 ETH through Tornado mixing.

Amount of loss
$ 3,000,000
Attack method
Flash loan attack
ETH EcosystemSecurity

Mar 14, 2022

2 verified updates
Several NFT players posted on social media that a project called "NFTflow" had a Rug Pull, ran away without completing the pre-sale, and transferred the 92 ETHs from the sale to the Tornado mixer. According to the official website, NFTflow calls itself "a platform for creating liquid markets for illiquid NFTs on StarkNet".ExpandCollapse

Several NFT players posted on social media that a project called "NFTflow" had a Rug Pull, ran away without completing the pre-sale, and transferred the 92 ETHs from the sale to the Tornado mixer. According to the official website, NFTflow calls itself "a platform for creating liquid markets for illiquid NFTs on StarkNet".

Amount of loss
92 ETH
Attack method
Rug Pull
NFTSecurity
According to RugDoc on Twitter, PulseDAO Finance has rugpulled. Social and website are closed. 4342 FTM was removed by contract developer.ExpandCollapse

According to RugDoc on Twitter, PulseDAO Finance has rugpulled. Social and website are closed. 4342 FTM was removed by contract developer.

Amount of loss
4342 FTM
Attack method
Rug Pull
Fantom EcosystemSecurity

Mar 13, 2022

1 verified update
The metaverse financial project Paraluni on the BSC chain was hacked, and the hackers made more than $1.7 million in profits. The problem lies in the depositByAddLiquidity method of the MasterCheif contract of the project side. This method does not check whether the token array parameter address[2] memory _tokens matches the LP pointed to by the pid parameter, and does not add lock when the LP amount changes.ExpandCollapse

The metaverse financial project Paraluni on the BSC chain was hacked, and the hackers made more than $1.7 million in profits. The problem lies in the depositByAddLiquidity method of the MasterCheif contract of the project side. This method does not check whether the token array parameter address[2] memory _tokens matches the LP pointed to by the pid parameter, and does not add lock when the LP amount changes.

Amount of loss
$ 1,700,000
Attack method
Reentrancy Attack
BSC EcosystemSecurity

Mar 10, 2022

2 verified updates
ActiveCampaign (AC), an external email marketing provider used by Unchained, was hacked last week, according to Joe Kelly, CEO of Bitcoin financial services firm Unchained Capital. Information shared with AC, including customer email addresses, usernames, account status, whether customers have active multi-signature vaults or loans using Unchained Capital, and possibly IP addresses may have flowed out without authorization. Kelly said no systems on Unchained were affected, meaning customer profile information that was never shared with AC was not leaked. Kelly added that while customer Bitcoin custody is protected by multi-signature cold storage, customers should still be aware of what's going on and be wary of phishing attacks.ExpandCollapse

ActiveCampaign (AC), an external email marketing provider used by Unchained, was hacked last week, according to Joe Kelly, CEO of Bitcoin financial services firm Unchained Capital. Information shared with AC, including customer email addresses, usernames, account status, whether customers have active multi-signature vaults or loans using Unchained Capital, and possibly IP addresses may have flowed out without authorization. Kelly said no systems on Unchained were affected, meaning customer profile information that was never shared with AC was not leaked. Kelly added that while customer Bitcoin custody is protected by multi-signature cold storage, customers should still be aware of what's going on and be wary of phishing attacks.

Attack method
Information Leakage
OtherSecurity
Fantom’s on-chain synthetic asset protocol, Fantasm Finance, posted on social media that its FTM collateral reserves had been exploited, and called on users to exchange their XFTM immediately. After exploiting the vulnerability, the hacker exchanged all the profits for ETH, and used Tornado.cash to mix coins across the chain to the Ethereum main network. According to statistics, the hacker made a profit of 1,007 ETH (about 2.73 million US dollars).ExpandCollapse

Fantom’s on-chain synthetic asset protocol, Fantasm Finance, posted on social media that its FTM collateral reserves had been exploited, and called on users to exchange their XFTM immediately. After exploiting the vulnerability, the hacker exchanged all the profits for ETH, and used Tornado.cash to mix coins across the chain to the Ethereum main network. According to statistics, the hacker made a profit of 1,007 ETH (about 2.73 million US dollars).

Amount of loss
1,007 ETH
Attack method
Contract Vulnerability
ETH EcosystemSecurity

Mar 9, 2022

1 verified update
The pledge contract (0x6912B19401913F1bd5020b3f59EE986c5792DA54) of the NFT adventure game Pirate X was attacked. When users deposit their PXP tokens into this contract, their tokens will be transferred to an EOA account (0x3b74a9cb5f1399b4a5a02559e67da37d450067b7). When the user withdraws the tokens, the contract will call "Transferfrom" to transfer these funds back. The attackers put these tokens on the market and made a profit of about 212 BNB.ExpandCollapse

The pledge contract (0x6912B19401913F1bd5020b3f59EE986c5792DA54) of the NFT adventure game Pirate X was attacked. When users deposit their PXP tokens into this contract, their tokens will be transferred to an EOA account (0x3b74a9cb5f1399b4a5a02559e67da37d450067b7). When the user withdraws the tokens, the contract will call "Transferfrom" to transfer these funds back. The attackers put these tokens on the market and made a profit of about 212 BNB.

Amount of loss
212 BNB
Attack method
Private Key Leakage
NFTSecurity

Mar 3, 2022

1 verified update
The Arbitrum-based TreasureDAO NFT trading market was exposed and discovered a vulnerability. According to SlowMist analysis, the core of this vulnerability lies in the lack of judgment that the incoming _quantity parameter is not 0 before the ERC-721 standard NFT transfer, resulting in ERC -721 Standard NFT can be transferred directly and the cost of purchasing NFT is calculated as 0 when calculating the price. Hours after it was stolen, developers confirmed that hackers had begun returning stolen “Smol Brains” and other NFTs.ExpandCollapse

The Arbitrum-based TreasureDAO NFT trading market was exposed and discovered a vulnerability. According to SlowMist analysis, the core of this vulnerability lies in the lack of judgment that the incoming _quantity parameter is not 0 before the ERC-721 standard NFT transfer, resulting in ERC -721 Standard NFT can be transferred directly and the cost of purchasing NFT is calculated as 0 when calculating the price. Hours after it was stolen, developers confirmed that hackers had begun returning stolen “Smol Brains” and other NFTs.

Attack method
Unchecked Input Data
Arbitrum EcosystemSecurity

Feb 23, 2022

1 verified update
Flurry Finance’s Vault contract was hit by a flash loan attack, resulting in the theft of approximately $293,000 worth of assets in the Vault contract.ExpandCollapse

Flurry Finance’s Vault contract was hit by a flash loan attack, resulting in the theft of approximately $293,000 worth of assets in the Vault contract.

Amount of loss
$293,000
Attack method
Flash Loan Attack
OtherSecurity

Feb 20, 2022

2 verified updates
MOX was hacked because transferFrom Function did not check the authorization limit.ExpandCollapse

MOX was hacked because transferFrom Function did not check the authorization limit.

Attack method
Contract Vulnerability
OtherSecurity
According to OpenSea's official tweet, hackers sent phishing emails to all users' mailboxes at the same time as the OpenSea contract was upgraded. Many users mistakenly thought it was an official email and authorized the wallet, which resulted in the wallet being stolen. OpenSea co-founder and CEO Devin Finzer confirmed the phishing attack in a tweet.ExpandCollapse

According to OpenSea's official tweet, hackers sent phishing emails to all users' mailboxes at the same time as the OpenSea contract was upgraded. Many users mistakenly thought it was an official email and authorized the wallet, which resulted in the wallet being stolen. OpenSea co-founder and CEO Devin Finzer confirmed the phishing attack in a tweet.

Amount of loss
$ 3,400,000
Attack method
Phishing Attack
NFTSecurity