Nvidia Corp. is likely to face a more hostile regulatory environment in Washington despite Chief Executive Officer Jensen Huang’s close ties to President Donald Trump, according to a report by Semafor. The chipmaker confronts mounting bipartisan pressure over its business practices in China, suggesting that personal access to the White House may not shield the company from stricter oversight.

Bipartisan Congressional Pressure

Lawmakers from both major political parties are intensifying their scrutiny of Nvidia’s operations. Three Republican members of the House of Representatives have requested Huang’s appearance at a briefing to address whether he was targeted by a Chinese intelligence agent. This security concern adds complexity to the ongoing debate over national security and technology exports.

Simultaneously, Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren wants Huang to testify before Congress on Nvidia’s chip sales to China and related matters, Semafor said. These parallel efforts highlight a rare area of bipartisan agreement on the need for tighter control over advanced semiconductor technology.

Tighter Export Controls Planned

While victorious Democrats look to take the lead in regulatory committees, Republicans are planning to impose tougher export controls on chips. This legislative push suggests that the regulatory environment for semiconductor firms will become more restrictive regardless of which party holds specific committee chairs.

The potential for stricter rules comes even as Huang maintains a prominent position in the administration. President Trump appointed Huang, along with other leaders from the crypto, blockchain, artificial intelligence and technology sectors, to his Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. Huang had previously met with the president to discuss export controls for Nvidia’s chips.

Despite these high-level connections, the convergence of security inquiries and legislative plans indicates that Nvidia’s relationship with the executive branch may offer limited protection against a more aggressive post-election regulatory landscape.