Digital Asset
Intelligence

Hacked Event Broadcast

Live source archive

Verified blockchain security incidents with original evidence and historical event dates.

Filters

Historical events use their original event dates. Latest event dates first. Severity follows existing archive classifications.

Aug 9, 2026

3 verified updates
Wallets linked to Coinsbuy (a B2B crypto payment processor) were drained of more than $7.9 million across Ethereum and TRON around 13:00 UTC on August 9, 2026. The attacker laundered part of the funds into Monero (XMR) via exchanges, while ChangeNOW helped freeze a six-figure amount; Coinsbuy temporarily paused deposits and withdrawals, which have since resumed.ExpandCollapse

Wallets linked to Coinsbuy (a B2B crypto payment processor) were drained of more than $7.9 million across Ethereum and TRON around 13:00 UTC on August 9, 2026. The attacker laundered part of the funds into Monero (XMR) via exchanges, while ChangeNOW helped freeze a six-figure amount; Coinsbuy temporarily paused deposits and withdrawals, which have since resumed.

Amount of loss
$ 7,900,000
Attack method
Unknown
ETH EcosystemSecurity
On August 9, 2026, the cross-chain bridge connecting the XRP Ledger and Coreum (now tx) was exploited. The attacker abused a flaw in the deposit-verification/relayer logic by creating fake deposits (self-transfers of the bridge’s own wrapped tokens with valid memos), tricking the relayers into authorizing real XRP withdrawals from the bridge’s reserve. Nearly 200,000 XRP (~$200,000) was drained in 94 multisig transactions over 97 minutes.ExpandCollapse

On August 9, 2026, the cross-chain bridge connecting the XRP Ledger and Coreum (now tx) was exploited. The attacker abused a flaw in the deposit-verification/relayer logic by creating fake deposits (self-transfers of the bridge’s own wrapped tokens with valid memos), tricking the relayers into authorizing real XRP withdrawals from the bridge’s reserve. Nearly 200,000 XRP (~$200,000) was drained in 94 multisig transactions over 97 minutes.

Amount of loss
$ 200,000
Attack method
Bridge Logic Vulnerability
BridgeSecurity
Oraichain (AI Layer 1) suffered from a vulnerability in its EVM cross-chain transfer path, enabling unauthorized minting of ORAI tokens. The network has been halted since 04:00 UTC on August 9, 2026, with bridges, cross-chain routes, and public interfaces restricted. The exploit path has been identified and addressed; the team is working with partners and CEXs to limit fund movements and is preparing to burn the unauthorized minted balances and reconcile protocol states to restore the canonical ORAI supply.ExpandCollapse

Oraichain (AI Layer 1) suffered from a vulnerability in its EVM cross-chain transfer path, enabling unauthorized minting of ORAI tokens. The network has been halted since 04:00 UTC on August 9, 2026, with bridges, cross-chain routes, and public interfaces restricted. The exploit path has been identified and addressed; the team is working with partners and CEXs to limit fund movements and is preparing to burn the unauthorized minted balances and reconcile protocol states to restore the canonical ORAI supply.

Amount of loss
0
Attack method
Cross-Chain Bridge Exploit
BridgeSecurity

Aug 8, 2026

1 verified update
Atomic Green (a non-custodial leveraged trading protocol on Arbitrum) was exploited due to a signature replay vulnerability. The same manager signature could be replayed across 21 different Uniswap V3 LP positions, combined with flashloan-based price manipulation, allowing the attacker to trigger unauthorized full LP burns and resulting in a loss of approximately 29,984.27 USDC.ExpandCollapse

Atomic Green (a non-custodial leveraged trading protocol on Arbitrum) was exploited due to a signature replay vulnerability. The same manager signature could be replayed across 21 different Uniswap V3 LP positions, combined with flashloan-based price manipulation, allowing the attacker to trigger unauthorized full LP burns and resulting in a loss of approximately 29,984.27 USDC.

Amount of loss
$ 29,984.27
Attack method
Signature Replay Attack
Arbitrum EcosystemSecurity

Aug 6, 2026

3 verified updates
The KITE Foundation detected abnormal KITE token transfers on Ethereum mainnet, confirming that some wallet addresses had been compromised by hackers. The team urgently paused ERC-20 transfers and related cross-chain channels, with no asset losses to users or the project. A new contract was later deployed, airdropping new tokens 1:1 to legitimate addresses based on the snapshot at block 25,692,498, excluding attacker-controlled addresses.ExpandCollapse

The KITE Foundation detected abnormal KITE token transfers on Ethereum mainnet, confirming that some wallet addresses had been compromised by hackers. The team urgently paused ERC-20 transfers and related cross-chain channels, with no asset losses to users or the project. A new contract was later deployed, airdropping new tokens 1:1 to legitimate addresses based on the snapshot at block 25,692,498, excluding attacker-controlled addresses.

Amount of loss
0
Attack method
Private Key Leakage
ETH EcosystemSecurity
Security firm Coinspect disclosed that RRWallet (RenrenBit’s wallet) generated vulnerable seed phrases due to a weak RNG in the CryptoJS library (Ill Bloom vulnerability, CVE-2026-71851), making private keys predictable and leading to theft. One user lost approximately $2 million.ExpandCollapse

Security firm Coinspect disclosed that RRWallet (RenrenBit’s wallet) generated vulnerable seed phrases due to a weak RNG in the CryptoJS library (Ill Bloom vulnerability, CVE-2026-71851), making private keys predictable and leading to theft. One user lost approximately $2 million.

Amount of loss
$ 2,000,000
Attack method
Supply Chain Attack
WalletSecurity
Unistreets LaunchpadFactoryAuto contract on Ethereum was exploited via arbitrary calldata injection. The factory custodied all launched tokens’ Uniswap V4 LP NFTs; the attacker injected setApprovalForAll approval and burned multiple LP positions, draining liquidity for a loss of approximately $17,750.ExpandCollapse

Unistreets LaunchpadFactoryAuto contract on Ethereum was exploited via arbitrary calldata injection. The factory custodied all launched tokens’ Uniswap V4 LP NFTs; the attacker injected setApprovalForAll approval and burned multiple LP positions, draining liquidity for a loss of approximately $17,750.

Amount of loss
$ 17,750
Attack method
Smart Contract Vulnerability
ETH EcosystemSecurity

Aug 5, 2026

1 verified update
ZEUS (Bitcoin Lightning Network wallet and LSP provider) infrastructure suffered a cybersecurity incident/attack within the last few hours; the attack was mitigated. Services were temporarily taken offline for a full systems audit out of caution; no customer funds were lost or at risk, and closed LSP channels will be replaced upon restoration. The incident appears limited to ZEUS infrastructure, with no evidence of a Lightning node software vulnerability.ExpandCollapse

ZEUS (Bitcoin Lightning Network wallet and LSP provider) infrastructure suffered a cybersecurity incident/attack within the last few hours; the attack was mitigated. Services were temporarily taken offline for a full systems audit out of caution; no customer funds were lost or at risk, and closed LSP channels will be replaced upon restoration. The incident appears limited to ZEUS infrastructure, with no evidence of a Lightning node software vulnerability.

Amount of loss
0
Attack method
Infrastructure Compromise
WalletSecurity

Aug 3, 2026

1 verified update
On August 3, 2026, an unauthorized withdrawal of 673,011.56 USDC occurred from the RWA strategy linked to RISEx’s XLP vault due to a misconfiguration present since its July 13 deployment. The team detected it within minutes, patched it by 08:09 UTC, and fully compensated XLP depositors using a portion of July fees; the platform and other components continued operating normally.ExpandCollapse

On August 3, 2026, an unauthorized withdrawal of 673,011.56 USDC occurred from the RWA strategy linked to RISEx’s XLP vault due to a misconfiguration present since its July 13 deployment. The team detected it within minutes, patched it by 08:09 UTC, and fully compensated XLP depositors using a portion of July fees; the platform and other components continued operating normally.

Amount of loss
$ 673,011.56
Attack method
Smart Contract Vulnerability
OtherSecurity

Aug 2, 2026

2 verified updates
LOOPSDAO’s LpdFi protocol on BSC was exploited. The attacker used a flash loan to manipulate the spot price of the thin PancakeSwap LPD/USDC pair (no TWAP or deviation guard), opened a massively inflated interest-bearing position with minimal LPD, and claimed interest right across the daily settlement boundary. This triggered the protocol to burn its own Cake-LP and pay out the inflated amount, draining approximately $690,000.ExpandCollapse

LOOPSDAO’s LpdFi protocol on BSC was exploited. The attacker used a flash loan to manipulate the spot price of the thin PancakeSwap LPD/USDC pair (no TWAP or deviation guard), opened a massively inflated interest-bearing position with minimal LPD, and claimed interest right across the daily settlement boundary. This triggered the protocol to burn its own Cake-LP and pay out the inflated amount, draining approximately $690,000.

Amount of loss
$ 690000
Attack method
Price Manipulation
BSC EcosystemSecurity
The MOKE token protocol on BNB Chain was exploited via a smart contract vulnerability. The attacker abused an unprotected public claim() function in MokeToken.releaseContract() (no eligibility check on the caller), repeatedly draining ~166 million MOKE from the protocol’s internal reserve pool, then used flash loans, Venus leverage, LP removal, and dividend distribution mechanisms to convert it into ~1,546 BNB, resulting in a loss of approximately $907,700.ExpandCollapse

The MOKE token protocol on BNB Chain was exploited via a smart contract vulnerability. The attacker abused an unprotected public claim() function in MokeToken.releaseContract() (no eligibility check on the caller), repeatedly draining ~166 million MOKE from the protocol’s internal reserve pool, then used flash loans, Venus leverage, LP removal, and dividend distribution mechanisms to convert it into ~1,546 BNB, resulting in a loss of approximately $907,700.

Amount of loss
$ 907700
Attack method
Smart Contract Vulnerability
BSC EcosystemSecurity

Jul 30, 2026

3 verified updates
Coldcard hardware wallets (by Coinkite) suffered from a firmware bug (since March 2021 on certain versions) that generated seeds with insufficient entropy (~40 bits on Mk3, ~72 bits on newer models vs. the intended 128 bits). Attackers offline brute-forced predictable private keys and drained numerous single-signature Bitcoin addresses across multiple waves without ever accessing the devices, with cumulative losses exceeding $100 million and the incident ongoing.ExpandCollapse

Coldcard hardware wallets (by Coinkite) suffered from a firmware bug (since March 2021 on certain versions) that generated seeds with insufficient entropy (~40 bits on Mk3, ~72 bits on newer models vs. the intended 128 bits). Attackers offline brute-forced predictable private keys and drained numerous single-signature Bitcoin addresses across multiple waves without ever accessing the devices, with cumulative losses exceeding $100 million and the incident ongoing.

Amount of loss
$ 100000000
Attack method
Firmware Vulnerability
OtherSecurity
The DeFi protocol Set Protocol (involving Index Coop’s ExchangeIssuance contract) was exploited due to insufficient state locking in the smart contract. The attacker used a malicious manager pre-issue hook to artificially inflate asset valuations (e.g., positionMultiplier), causing the contract to transfer excess assets based on falsified data, resulting in a loss of approximately $9,600.ExpandCollapse

The DeFi protocol Set Protocol (involving Index Coop’s ExchangeIssuance contract) was exploited due to insufficient state locking in the smart contract. The attacker used a malicious manager pre-issue hook to artificially inflate asset valuations (e.g., positionMultiplier), causing the contract to transfer excess assets based on falsified data, resulting in a loss of approximately $9,600.

Amount of loss
$ 9,600
Attack method
Smart Contract Vulnerability
OtherSecurity
The decentralized asset management protocol Swan Treasury on BNB Chain was exploited due to the leakage of an off-chain signer's private key (the _signer key hardcoded in the ZhaiquanBuy contract). The attacker forged valid signatures and used PancakeSwap flash loans to purchase approximately 687,000 STY tokens at around a 100x discount (spending approximately 19,700 USDT). The attacker then forged the related claim()/transfer signatures and dumped the tokens into the STY/USDT pool, making a profit of approximately $625,000.ExpandCollapse

The decentralized asset management protocol Swan Treasury on BNB Chain was exploited due to the leakage of an off-chain signer's private key (the _signer key hardcoded in the ZhaiquanBuy contract). The attacker forged valid signatures and used PancakeSwap flash loans to purchase approximately 687,000 STY tokens at around a 100x discount (spending approximately 19,700 USDT). The attacker then forged the related claim()/transfer signatures and dumped the tokens into the STY/USDT pool, making a profit of approximately $625,000.

Amount of loss
$ 625,000
Attack method
Private Key Leakage
BSC EcosystemSecurity

Jul 28, 2026

2 verified updates
The Pro token contract of Crypto DAO was exploited due to missing access control, with the attacker calling publicly accessible vault functions. According to GoPlus Security’s analysis, the attacker’s actual profit was approximately $52,000, while the contract lost around 167,200 Pro tokens. The related addresses monitored by Blockaid collectively held approximately $8.2 million worth of USDT (not the actual stolen amount).ExpandCollapse

The Pro token contract of Crypto DAO was exploited due to missing access control, with the attacker calling publicly accessible vault functions. According to GoPlus Security’s analysis, the attacker’s actual profit was approximately $52,000, while the contract lost around 167,200 Pro tokens. The related addresses monitored by Blockaid collectively held approximately $8.2 million worth of USDT (not the actual stolen amount).

Amount of loss
$ 52,000
Attack method
Smart Contract Vulnerability
OtherSecurity
The LULA token on BSC was exploited when attackers abused the privileged recycle() function in its contract, combined with an approximately $237 million flash loan to manipulate PancakeSwap V2 liquidity pool reserves, resulting in a loss of about $578,100.ExpandCollapse

The LULA token on BSC was exploited when attackers abused the privileged recycle() function in its contract, combined with an approximately $237 million flash loan to manipulate PancakeSwap V2 liquidity pool reserves, resulting in a loss of about $578,100.

Amount of loss
$ 578,100
Attack method
Price Manipulation Attack
BSC EcosystemSecurity

Jul 26, 2026

3 verified updates
ChainConnect’s EVM integration was compromised through unauthorized access. Approximately $650,000 in tokens was drained from the bridge contracts across Ethereum, BNB Chain, Avalanche C-Chain and Polygon in 23 transactions; bridge operations were paused immediately.ExpandCollapse

ChainConnect’s EVM integration was compromised through unauthorized access. Approximately $650,000 in tokens was drained from the bridge contracts across Ethereum, BNB Chain, Avalanche C-Chain and Polygon in 23 transactions; bridge operations were paused immediately.

Amount of loss
$ 650,000
Attack method
Unauthorized Access
ETH EcosystemSecurity
Security firm Blockaid detected an ongoing exploit targeting Garden Finance’s HTLC contracts, draining about $450,000 in USDT across Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum, and BNB Chain. The project stated that an independent solver’s off-chain database was compromised and fraudulent records were inserted, causing improper fund releases; the protocol and smart contracts themselves were not compromised, and the app has been temporarily taken offline.ExpandCollapse

Security firm Blockaid detected an ongoing exploit targeting Garden Finance’s HTLC contracts, draining about $450,000 in USDT across Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum, and BNB Chain. The project stated that an independent solver’s off-chain database was compromised and fraudulent records were inserted, causing improper fund releases; the protocol and smart contracts themselves were not compromised, and the app has been temporarily taken offline.

Amount of loss
$ 450,000
Attack method
Supply Chain Attack
ETH EcosystemSecurity
The owner privileges of a WEMIX$-related smart contract were compromised, allowing the attacker to illegally mint approximately 5.23 million WEMIX$ stablecoins (worth about $6.25 million), which were swapped into WEMIX and USDC.e before being bridged out. The team has suspended bridges and related services while working with exchanges, security firms, and law enforcement to track the funds.ExpandCollapse

The owner privileges of a WEMIX$-related smart contract were compromised, allowing the attacker to illegally mint approximately 5.23 million WEMIX$ stablecoins (worth about $6.25 million), which were swapped into WEMIX and USDC.e before being bridged out. The team has suspended bridges and related services while working with exchanges, security firms, and law enforcement to track the funds.

Amount of loss
$ 6,250,000
Attack method
Private Key Leakage
OtherSecurity

Jul 25, 2026

2 verified updates
The Bankrbot X account (despite on-device passkey) was compromised and posted fake airdrop links; concurrently, the project's Bankr wallet (without MFA) was drained of ~1.5 billion $BNKR tokens which were then dumped.ExpandCollapse

The Bankrbot X account (despite on-device passkey) was compromised and posted fake airdrop links; concurrently, the project's Bankr wallet (without MFA) was drained of ~1.5 billion $BNKR tokens which were then dumped.

Amount of loss
$ 479,885
Attack method
Account Compromise
WalletSecurity