Digital Asset
Intelligence

Hacked Event Broadcast

Live source archive

Verified blockchain security incidents with original evidence and historical event dates.

Filters

Historical events use their original event dates. Latest event dates first. Severity follows existing archive classifications.

Jul 25, 2026

2 verified updates
The Projekt (GREEN/GOLD) reward vault on Ethereum was exploited. The attacker flash-loaned ~14K WETH from Morpho, pushed it into multiple Uniswap V2 memecoin pairs and used skim() to create fake “purchase” records. Exploiting the permissionless trackPurchase function (which only reads token balance deltas to size rewards without verifying actual ETH spent), they inflated reward allocations and drained ~301.7 ETH (~$560K) from the vault’s reward pool via massWithdraw.ExpandCollapse

The Projekt (GREEN/GOLD) reward vault on Ethereum was exploited. The attacker flash-loaned ~14K WETH from Morpho, pushed it into multiple Uniswap V2 memecoin pairs and used skim() to create fake “purchase” records. Exploiting the permissionless trackPurchase function (which only reads token balance deltas to size rewards without verifying actual ETH spent), they inflated reward allocations and drained ~301.7 ETH (~$560K) from the vault’s reward pool via massWithdraw.

Amount of loss
$ 560000
Attack method
Flash Loan Attack
ETH EcosystemSecurity

Jul 24, 2026

2 verified updates
On July 24, 2026, Lien Finance (an Ethereum DeFi structured products protocol) was exploited. The attacker abused a validation flaw in the exchangeEquivalentBonds function of the BondMakerCollateralizedEth contract (missing multiset integrity checks), minting unbacked bond tokens and draining approximately $542K USDC via OTC pools.ExpandCollapse

On July 24, 2026, Lien Finance (an Ethereum DeFi structured products protocol) was exploited. The attacker abused a validation flaw in the exchangeEquivalentBonds function of the BondMakerCollateralizedEth contract (missing multiset integrity checks), minting unbacked bond tokens and draining approximately $542K USDC via OTC pools.

Amount of loss
$ 542,000
Attack method
Smart Contract Vulnerability
ETH EcosystemSecurity
Singapore-based stablecoin payments firm Triple-A suffered unauthorized access to its hot wallets across multiple chains, with attackers draining approximately $9.7M–$11.8M in company-owned digital assets that were swapped and bridged/consolidated to a single Ethereum address. Client funds remained unaffected in separate trust accounts; services were briefly paused for security checks and have been fully restored.ExpandCollapse

Singapore-based stablecoin payments firm Triple-A suffered unauthorized access to its hot wallets across multiple chains, with attackers draining approximately $9.7M–$11.8M in company-owned digital assets that were swapped and bridged/consolidated to a single Ethereum address. Client funds remained unaffected in separate trust accounts; services were briefly paused for security checks and have been fully restored.

Amount of loss
$ 11,800,000
Attack method
Hot Wallet Compromise
ETH EcosystemSecurity

Jul 23, 2026

2 verified updates
Solido Cash (the largest DeFi protocol on Supra) was exploited due to an oracle misassignment on SOLID collateral (stale feed fallback to CASH oracle, severely overvaluing collateral). The attacker, in two waves (one atomic tx + one multi-wallet manual), deposited cheap collateral, minted excess CASH, and sold it on DEXs for SUPRA, netting ~293.7M SUPRA. No user funds were affected; losses primarily hit LPs (mostly the foundation) and protocol reserves. The protocol paused relevant functions and released a forensic report.ExpandCollapse

Solido Cash (the largest DeFi protocol on Supra) was exploited due to an oracle misassignment on SOLID collateral (stale feed fallback to CASH oracle, severely overvaluing collateral). The attacker, in two waves (one atomic tx + one multi-wallet manual), deposited cheap collateral, minted excess CASH, and sold it on DEXs for SUPRA, netting ~293.7M SUPRA. No user funds were affected; losses primarily hit LPs (mostly the foundation) and protocol reserves. The protocol paused relevant functions and released a forensic report.

Amount of loss
$ 73,400
Attack method
Oracle Misassignment
WalletSecurity
The Verus Ethereum Bridge was exploited again. The attacker abused the bridge’s import path to trigger unbacked payouts on the Ethereum side, draining approximately $7.54 million in assets (ETH, tBTC, USDC, etc.) from the bridge reserves. This is the second exploit of the same flaw from May. The project has not issued a detailed official statement yet.ExpandCollapse

The Verus Ethereum Bridge was exploited again. The attacker abused the bridge’s import path to trigger unbacked payouts on the Ethereum side, draining approximately $7.54 million in assets (ETH, tBTC, USDC, etc.) from the bridge reserves. This is the second exploit of the same flaw from May. The project has not issued a detailed official statement yet.

Amount of loss
$ 7,540,000
Attack method
Smart Contract Vulnerability
ETH EcosystemSecurity

Jul 22, 2026

2 verified updates
The 42DAO protocol was exploited. The attacker manipulated the Median Oracle with an abnormally low BTCB price, triggering forced liquidations of multiple BTCB vaults and profiting approximately $915,000. This caused its algorithmic stablecoin Balance Coin (BLC) to crash over 99% from near $1 to about $0.001.ExpandCollapse

The 42DAO protocol was exploited. The attacker manipulated the Median Oracle with an abnormally low BTCB price, triggering forced liquidations of multiple BTCB vaults and profiting approximately $915,000. This caused its algorithmic stablecoin Balance Coin (BLC) to crash over 99% from near $1 to about $0.001.

Amount of loss
$ 915,000
Attack method
Price Oracle Manipulation
OtherSecurity
The AFX-operated cross-chain/USDC custody bridge on Arbitrum was exploited. The attacker used compromised validator hot keys to meet the quorum and drain approximately $24.15 million USDC. The funds were bridged to Ethereum and swapped for ETH. Arbitrum’s native bridge was unaffected, and AFX’s core trading infrastructure remained secure. The team suspended bridge operations and is investigating with security partners.ExpandCollapse

The AFX-operated cross-chain/USDC custody bridge on Arbitrum was exploited. The attacker used compromised validator hot keys to meet the quorum and drain approximately $24.15 million USDC. The funds were bridged to Ethereum and swapped for ETH. Arbitrum’s native bridge was unaffected, and AFX’s core trading infrastructure remained secure. The team suspended bridge operations and is investigating with security partners.

Amount of loss
$ 24,150,000
Attack method
Private Key Leakage
ETH EcosystemSecurity

Jul 21, 2026

2 verified updates
FlashTrade (a Solana perps protocol) detected an unauthorized $98,000 withdrawal from its ephemeral instance. As a precaution, trading, deposits, and withdrawals were paused. Thanks to the newly rolled-out withdrawal batching and monitoring system, the incident was detected quickly and contained. The team will fully cover the amount, with all user funds safe.ExpandCollapse

FlashTrade (a Solana perps protocol) detected an unauthorized $98,000 withdrawal from its ephemeral instance. As a precaution, trading, deposits, and withdrawals were paused. Thanks to the newly rolled-out withdrawal batching and monitoring system, the incident was detected quickly and contained. The team will fully cover the amount, with all user funds safe.

Amount of loss
$ 98,000
Attack method
Validation Flaw
Solana EcosystemSecurity
Wanchain’s Cardano-to-BNB Chain cross-chain bridge was exploited. The attacker drained approximately 515 million NIGHT tokens from the Cardano-side lock address. The incident may involve signature validation or replay flaws. Wanchain suspended the bridge; Midnight’s core network was unaffected. Multiple exchanges froze related funds, and NIGHT price dropped sharply before partial recovery.ExpandCollapse

Wanchain’s Cardano-to-BNB Chain cross-chain bridge was exploited. The attacker drained approximately 515 million NIGHT tokens from the Cardano-side lock address. The incident may involve signature validation or replay flaws. Wanchain suspended the bridge; Midnight’s core network was unaffected. Multiple exchanges froze related funds, and NIGHT price dropped sharply before partial recovery.

Amount of loss
$10,000,000
Attack method
Smart Contract Vulnerability
BSC EcosystemSecurity

Jul 19, 2026

2 verified updates
Cross-chain bridge protocol Allbridge Core was exploited on July 19-20, 2026. The attacker used a ~$1.12M USDC flash loan from Kamino to rapidly swap in the Solana USDC/USDT liquidity pools, manipulating ratios and draining approximately $1.65 million. The team paused the protocol, urged affected LPs to withdraw funds immediately, and asked arbitrage profiteers to return funds for LP compensation.ExpandCollapse

Cross-chain bridge protocol Allbridge Core was exploited on July 19-20, 2026. The attacker used a ~$1.12M USDC flash loan from Kamino to rapidly swap in the Solana USDC/USDT liquidity pools, manipulating ratios and draining approximately $1.65 million. The team paused the protocol, urged affected LPs to withdraw funds immediately, and asked arbitrage profiteers to return funds for LP compensation.

Amount of loss
$ 1,650,000
Attack method
Flash Loan Price Manipulation
Solana EcosystemSecurity
Zilliqa announced that ZIL was stolen from a cold wallet of one of its exchange partners. Investigation confirmed the root cause was a nonce-generation vulnerability in the Zilliqa Ledger app (present since 2019), allowing private key recovery from on-chain Schnorr signatures (after ~5+ native transactions). It was not due to the exchange’s operations. Native transactions were suspended and a fix is being coordinated.ExpandCollapse

Zilliqa announced that ZIL was stolen from a cold wallet of one of its exchange partners. Investigation confirmed the root cause was a nonce-generation vulnerability in the Zilliqa Ledger app (present since 2019), allowing private key recovery from on-chain Schnorr signatures (after ~5+ native transactions). It was not due to the exchange’s operations. Native transactions were suspended and a fix is being coordinated.

Attack method
Private Key Leakage
WalletSecurity

Jul 17, 2026

1 verified update
Cross-chain bridge protocol Across was attacked on its Solana deployment on July 17, 2026. The attacker exploited a gap in Solana’s event system to spoof deposit signals, tricking relayers into paying out on fake deposits. User funds remained completely safe with zero losses; all transactions were completed or fully refunded. Losses were contained to the Risk Labs-operated relayer. The team paused Solana deposits and restored operations the next day, with a full post-mortem planned.ExpandCollapse

Cross-chain bridge protocol Across was attacked on its Solana deployment on July 17, 2026. The attacker exploited a gap in Solana’s event system to spoof deposit signals, tricking relayers into paying out on fake deposits. User funds remained completely safe with zero losses; all transactions were completed or fully refunded. Losses were contained to the Risk Labs-operated relayer. The team paused Solana deposits and restored operations the next day, with a full post-mortem planned.

Amount of loss
0
Attack method
Deposit signal spoofing
Solana EcosystemSecurity

Jul 16, 2026

1 verified update
The Solana-based DeFi protocol DefiTuna's lending pools were exploited by an attacker who drained approximately $580K, creating a matching deficit in the USDC lending pool. The attack vector has been identified and patched; the team is investigating and working on fund recovery.ExpandCollapse

The Solana-based DeFi protocol DefiTuna's lending pools were exploited by an attacker who drained approximately $580K, creating a matching deficit in the USDC lending pool. The attack vector has been identified and patched; the team is investigating and working on fund recovery.

Amount of loss
$ 580,000
Attack method
Smart Contract Vulnerability
Solana EcosystemSecurity

Jul 15, 2026

4 verified updates
DeFi protocol BarnBridge suffered a governance attack on July 15, 2026. The attacker gained control of the DAO via a malicious governance proposal, upgraded the proxy contract to a malicious implementation, and drained approximately $776,000 USDC by exploiting pre-existing approvals from around 50 user addresses.ExpandCollapse

DeFi protocol BarnBridge suffered a governance attack on July 15, 2026. The attacker gained control of the DAO via a malicious governance proposal, upgraded the proxy contract to a malicious implementation, and drained approximately $776,000 USDC by exploiting pre-existing approvals from around 50 user addresses.

Amount of loss
$ 776,000
Attack method
Governance Attack
OtherSecurity
Cascade, a perpetual contract platform backed by institutions including Polychain, was attacked on Arbitrum through its pre-launch locked CLS vault (First Wave invite-only deposits). The attacker accumulated long positions in a low-liquidity market to hedge against CLS short positions, artificially manipulated the mark price upward, triggering large-scale liquidations of CLS short positions. After profiting from the attack, the attacker immediately withdrew approximately $1.34 million USDC. The project team paused trading and withdrawals, and the funds were largely recovered afterward, with full compensation arranged for affected users.ExpandCollapse

Cascade, a perpetual contract platform backed by institutions including Polychain, was attacked on Arbitrum through its pre-launch locked CLS vault (First Wave invite-only deposits). The attacker accumulated long positions in a low-liquidity market to hedge against CLS short positions, artificially manipulated the mark price upward, triggering large-scale liquidations of CLS short positions. After profiting from the attack, the attacker immediately withdrew approximately $1.34 million USDC. The project team paused trading and withdrawals, and the funds were largely recovered afterward, with full compensation arranged for affected users.

Amount of loss
$ 1,343,921
Attack method
Price Manipulation
Arbitrum EcosystemSecurity
Ostium, an RWA-focused perpetuals DEX on Arbitrum, suffered an oracle manipulation exploit. The attacker used a compromised oracle signer key to submit fraudulent future-dated price reports, generating artificial trading profits and draining approximately $18 million USDC from the liquidity vault. The protocol has halted trading and is investigating.ExpandCollapse

Ostium, an RWA-focused perpetuals DEX on Arbitrum, suffered an oracle manipulation exploit. The attacker used a compromised oracle signer key to submit fraudulent future-dated price reports, generating artificial trading profits and draining approximately $18 million USDC from the liquidity vault. The protocol has halted trading and is investigating.

Amount of loss
$ 18,000,000
Attack method
Private Key Leakage
Arbitrum EcosystemSecurity
The cross-chain bridge protocol TeleSwap was suspected of being exploited on July 15, 2026. Suspicious outflows of over $735,000 occurred from its Bitcoin hot wallet, which then stopped processing transactions. Five days later, the project has still not publicly disclosed the incident, and the attacker has moved funds toward Tornado Cash for laundering.ExpandCollapse

The cross-chain bridge protocol TeleSwap was suspected of being exploited on July 15, 2026. Suspicious outflows of over $735,000 occurred from its Bitcoin hot wallet, which then stopped processing transactions. Five days later, the project has still not publicly disclosed the incident, and the attacker has moved funds toward Tornado Cash for laundering.

Amount of loss
$ 735,000
Attack method
Unknown
BridgeSecurity

Jul 14, 2026

1 verified update
DeFi streaming payments protocol Drips Network was exploited on July 14, 2026. The attacker used an unsafe integer cast vulnerability (uint128 to int128) in the DaiDripsHub.give() function on Ethereum, causing a negative value to flip positive and reverse the transfer direction, draining 24,882.99 DAI (~$24,900) from the DaiReserve.ExpandCollapse

DeFi streaming payments protocol Drips Network was exploited on July 14, 2026. The attacker used an unsafe integer cast vulnerability (uint128 to int128) in the DaiDripsHub.give() function on Ethereum, causing a negative value to flip positive and reverse the transfer direction, draining 24,882.99 DAI (~$24,900) from the DaiReserve.

Amount of loss
$ 24,900
Attack method
Smart Contract Vulnerability
ETH EcosystemSecurity

Jul 13, 2026

2 verified updates
Chi Protocol (a DeFi stablecoin protocol issuing $USC backed by LSTs/LRTs on Ethereum) was exploited due to a logic error in the ArbitrageV5 contract’s burn() function. The attacker used a flash loan to buy heavily depegged $USC cheaply on a thin Uniswap V2 pool and burned it to redeem full-value collateral (weETH/stETH/WETH) at the hardcoded $1 peg, without the burn function checking the actual peg (unlike the mint function). This resulted in approximately $8,500 loss, nearly draining the protocol’s reserves.ExpandCollapse

Chi Protocol (a DeFi stablecoin protocol issuing $USC backed by LSTs/LRTs on Ethereum) was exploited due to a logic error in the ArbitrageV5 contract’s burn() function. The attacker used a flash loan to buy heavily depegged $USC cheaply on a thin Uniswap V2 pool and burned it to redeem full-value collateral (weETH/stETH/WETH) at the hardcoded $1 peg, without the burn function checking the actual peg (unlike the mint function). This resulted in approximately $8,500 loss, nearly draining the protocol’s reserves.

Amount of loss
$ 8,500
Attack method
Smart Contract Logic Vulnerability
ETH EcosystemSecurity
The DeFi protocol Lumi Finance on Arbitrum suffered an exploit where attackers leveraged Sodium smart accounts that performed token approvals as a side effect during UserOp validation. This allowed a malicious Paymaster to gain allowances from multiple accounts and drain funds, resulting in approximately $270,000 in losses.ExpandCollapse

The DeFi protocol Lumi Finance on Arbitrum suffered an exploit where attackers leveraged Sodium smart accounts that performed token approvals as a side effect during UserOp validation. This allowed a malicious Paymaster to gain allowances from multiple accounts and drain funds, resulting in approximately $270,000 in losses.

Amount of loss
$ 270,000
Attack method
Smart Contract Logic Vulnerability
Arbitrum EcosystemSecurity